2010 Iraqi Death Counts And Averages
2010 | Iraq Body Count | Icasualties | Iraqi Ministries | Avg. Monthly Deaths | Avg. Daily Deaths |
Jan. | 260 | 135 | 196 | 197 | 6.3 |
Feb. | 297 | 236 | 352 | 295 | 10.5 |
Mar. | 334 | 183 | 367 | 294 | 9.5 |
Apr. | 380 | 259 | 328 | 322 | 10.7 |
May | 377 | 279 | 337 | 331 | 10.6 |
Jun. | 368 | 176 | 284 | 276 | 9.2 |
Jul. | 430 | 534 | 535 | 499 | 16.1 |
Aug. | 517 | 363 | 426 | 435 | 14.0 |
Sep. | 252 | 174 | 273 | 233 | 7.7 |
Oct. | 311 | 185 | 293 | 263 | 8.4 |
Nov. | 300 | 174 | 171 | 215 | 7.1 |
Dec. | 217 | 128 | 151 | 165 | 5.3 |
Total Iraqi Deaths 2003-2010
Brookings Institution | Iraq Body Count | U.S. Military | Icasualties | Iraqi Ministries | Avg. Daily Deaths | |
2003 | 7,298 | 4,661 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 16.3 |
2004 | 16,894 | 10,834 | 8,993 | N/A | N/A | 28.8 |
2005 | 20,163 | 15,031 | 8,993 | 8,225 | N/A | 35.8 |
2006 | 30,514 | 27,850 | 31,253 | 18,655 | N/A | 74.1 |
2007 | 23,550 | 24,677 | 28,041 | 18,938 | N/A | 65.2 |
2008 | 6,360 | 9,245 | 8,310 | 5,929 | N/A | 20.4 |
2009 | 3,000 | 4,681 | 2,891 | 3,119 | 3,492 | 9.4 |
2010 | 2,405 to Nov. | 4,043 | N/A | 2,826 | 3,713 | 8.8 |
Totals | 110,184 (to Nov. 10) | 101,022 | 83,300 (2004-2009) | 57,692 (2005-2010) | 7,205 (2009-2010) |
Click on image for larger view |
Click on image for larger view |
Iraq Body Count and icasualties noted a slight decrease in annual deaths from 2009 to 2010, while the Iraqi government actually had an increase. Iraq Body Count went from 4,681 deaths in 2009 to 4,043 in 2010, and icasualties dropped from 3,119 to 2,826. Iraq's ministries on the other hand, had a rise. There were three different figures attributed to Baghdad. By adding up the monthly reports it gave to the press there were 3,492 killed in 2009, going up to 3,713 in 2010. The Associated Press said the government told them were 3,525 killed last year. Reuters counted 3,605 fatalities based upon official releases in 2010, up from 3,481 in 2009. The authorities attributed the increase to the number of soldiers and police killed going up from 204 in 2009 to 215 last year.
What the statistics reveal is that violence in Iraq has hit a plateau since 2009. From 2003 to 2006 the war in Iraq dramatically increased from an average of 16.3 killed per day in 2003 to 28.8 in 2004, 35.8 in 2005, before reaching a high of 74.1 in 2006 as the civil war hit full throttle. Since then fighting has steadily decreased as the sectarian conflict ended, dropping to an average of 65.2 killed in 2007, to 20.4 in 2008, and then hitting an all time low of 9.4 in 2009 and 8.8 in 2010. The averages were calculated using numbers provided by the Brookings Institution, Iraq Body Count, icasualties, the U.S. military, and the Iraqi government. The actual numbers are likely much higher because the U.S. military from 2004-2005 was only casually collecting data on Iraqi violence, resulting in very low numbers for those first two years, while icasualties only uses Western sources for its statistics, and notes that it misses many fatalities. Both tend to drag down the averages. In 2004 for example, if only Brookings and Iraq Body Count are used, and not the U.S. forces’ numbers, there would be an average of 37.9 killed per day instead of 28.8. Likewise, at the height of the fighting in Iraq in 2006, icasualties only recorded around two-thirds as many deaths as Brookings, Iraq Body Count, and the Americans.
Overall, Iraq has hit what some U.S. officers have called the “irreducible minimum.” That means most of the militias and insurgents have been disbanded, disbursed, killed, arrested, or turned, leaving only the most irreconcilable to continue on with the fight. It would require political compromises to change this current status quo. Iraq Body Count, in an end of the year report “Iraqi deaths from violence in 2010,” came to a similar conclusion, predicting that violence in Iraq would continue at the same level for the foreseeable future. While many Iraqis are moving on with their life, and the security situation has dramatically improved with the end of the civil war, several thousand Iraqis will continue to die each year until the political and economic situation improves in the country.
SOURCES
Associated Press, “Iraq: December the least deadly month of the year,” 1/1/11
Cordesman, Anthony, “Victory And Violence In Iraq: Reducing the ‘Irreducible Minimum,’” Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2/25/08
Dunlop, W.G., "2010 Iraq death toll tops 2009: government," Agence France Presse, 1/1/10
icasualties
Iraq Body Count, “Iraqi deaths from violence in 2010,” 12/30/10
- “Monthly table”
- “Recent Events”
O’Hanlon, Michael Livingston, Ian, “Iraq Index,” Brookings Institution, 12/9/10
3 comments:
"It would require political compromises to change this current status quo. "
Or more hard work by the security forces. I see no reason in principle why Mosul cannot be cleaned up.
The leveling off of violence for the last two years is a very positive sign. On the other hand, I still think all the numbers in the country are low. Mainly the level of murders/homicides in Iraq is unknown. Iraqi police still have trouble patrolling certain areas and therefore don't adequately investigate most crimes.
The biggest question for 2010 is what effect the complete drawdown of US forces will have on remaining insurgent elements. If Sunni and Shia groups have been biding their time for US withdrawal, then we could see a slight uptick in violence above 2009/10 levels, though probably not above 2008 numbers.
I think security will basically stay the same for the foreseable future. On the bad side, Iraqis do less patrolling than the Americans did and do not have as many intelligence resources. They also don't have the air cover. Those have allowed some militants the opportunity to regroup since the U.S. left the cities. On the positive side, hardly anyone wants to fight anymore. It's the losing side. I expect the insurgency to eventually end, it's just a matter of time.
Post a Comment