Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Understanding Anbar Before And After The Awakening Part III, Sheikh Ahmed Sattar Al-Rishawi Abu Risha

Sheikh Abdul Sattar Abu Risha was not the first in Anbar to challenge Al Qaeda in Iraq’s hold upon the province, but he was the most successful at it. He proposed the Anbar Awakening in 2006, which eventually helped re-take the governorate away from the militants. It was a dramatic transformation for a place that the American forces had almost written off. Abu Risha had far more goals than that, but he wasn’t able to see them come to fruition as he was assassinated a year after he formed the Awakening. His brother, Ahmed Sattar al-Rishawi Abu Risha took over the movement after his brother’s death. He followed through with Abdul’s plans and transformed the movement into a political organization. To Ahmed Abu Risha the Awakening was an initiative that only Iraqis could have come up with, as only they had the ability to sway others away from the insurgency and transform Anbar.

Sheikh Ahmed Abu Risha foresaw his Awakening movement as a way to enter Iraqi politics (AP)

Anbar went from good to bad in Sheikh Ahmed Abu Risha’s view after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. In 2003, sheikhs negotiated a deal for U.S. forces to enter the province, and they set up a new local government. Abu Risha claimed that things were going fine, until some started talking about fighting the Americans. They condemned those who cooperated with the occupation, and slowly but surely gained more followers as the insurgency began. It quickly moved from attacking the Americans to the Iraqi government and police. Eventually Al Qaeda in Iraq and foreign fighters arrived, and they intensified the violence by going after schools and teachers and anyone involved in politics. Many professionals ended up fleeing the province as a result going to places like Jordan and Syria. Eventually the militants had free reign in Anbar, and seized control of institutions such as the Ramadi hospital, the governorate’s Education Department, universities, and others. Abu Risha claimed that his tribe was not involved in any of these activities at this time, but there are plenty of other accounts that would say otherwise. Most claimed that Abdul Abu Risha cooperated with Al Qaeda in Iraq, and even tried establishing his own nationalist armed group in 2005, but failed. Either way, his account is a common one where Anbar became a hotbed of anti-American and anti-government sentiment, which quickly turned violent. Al Qaeda and other foreign groups took advantage of this situation, and eventually gained control of large sections of the province. The hope for a normal life ceased as a result.

The tribes in Anbar went from accepting this situation to challenging it. According to Ahmed Abu Risha many sheikhs set up their own local security around their compounds, but did little else as their province went up in flames. The insurgency then began challenging the tribes to usurp their power. This affected Abu Risha personally as his father and three brothers were all killed by Al Qaeda in Iraq for disagreeing with it. The tribes were split over what to do. At first, they blamed each other, but then some decided to stand up to the militants. Abu Risha acknowledged that the Albu Mahal tribe had risen up against Al Qaeda before the Awakening in 2005, but there were several others. Those included the Albu Nimr who fought the Islamists along the Syrian border in, and elements of the Dulaimi tribe in Ramadi. The Abu Rishas like to take credit for the tribal revolt, but they were following in the footsteps of several others who had made a decision to challenge the militants the year before. They each had their own motivations ranging from coming under attack by the Islamists to having their businesses taken over to disagreeing with their extremist views, but the point was by 2005 there was a steady change in opinion amongst some sheikhs and clerics that they had enough of the chaos in their governorate, and they needed to do something about it.

Abdul Abu Risha decided to lead his own revolt against Al Qaeda in 2006. Abdul had run a construction and import-export business, but he was also involved in criminal activities such as smuggling. In the fall of 2006, he decided to talk to other tribes to get them organized against the insurgents. In September several sheikhs held a meeting where they announced the formation of the Anbar Awakening. It included 25 of the 31 tribes in Anbar, with around 30,000 armed men. The main plan was to take on the militants, gain American assistance, be accepted by the central government, and then assume power in Anbar through control of the local security forces and the provincial council. These bold ideas showed that Abdul Abu Risha was thinking far ahead of just securing Anbar, and had aspirations to become a national leader in Iraq.

The Awakening started operating in Abu Risha’s home of Ramadi, but then spread across central Iraq. By November 2006, the group had gained control of much of Ramadi. By the summer of 2007 it was sending units to Salahaddin, Diyala, Babil, and Baghdad to organize groups there, as well as the south as many Iraqi tribes have both Shiite and Sunni members. The U.S. began pushing the government to accept the tribesmen in the army and police, and made sure they were trained, armed, and paid on time. In Ramadi for example, the number of police went from around 150 before the Awakening to 1,500 by December 2006, to 3,000 by February 2007. The Awakening eventually broke the back of Al Qaeda in Iraq in Anbar, which was one of its main bases in the country. They played upon the public’s increasingly hostile view of the Islamists who were pushing their foreign ideas and using violence against anyone that opposed them.

When security was restored in Anbar, the Awakening then moved to become a political party. First, Abdul Abu Risha tried to prove his bona fides with Baghdad by meeting with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki three times, and getting the premier to visit Anbar and see the success of the Awakening. They then began challenging Anbar Governor Mamoum Sami Rasheed al-Alwani and the Islamic Party that ran the province, claiming that it was working with the insurgents. By 2007, Abu Risha got some of his followers onto the provincial council, started considering candidates to run in the next elections, set up offices across the country, and registered 400,000 members. Unfortunately, Abdul Abu Risha was killed in September 2007 by Al Qaeda, and was succeeded by his brother Ahmed. In the 2009 vote, he led his party to victory, winning the most seats in Anbar. By that time, the Awakening had men throughout the local security forces, was recognized by both the Americans and Baghdad, and now had control of its home governorate. This was all part of Abdul Abu Risha’s vision to assume power, and spread his influence throughout Iraq. Unlike the Sons of Iraq, which the Americans put together during the Surge, the Awakening was accepted by the central government, because it was seen as an indigenous movement. Baghdad had no problem with them joining the security forces or running in elections. The Abu Rishas emerged as a success story in Iraq, rising up from a minor tribe to being a force in politics.

Ahmed Abu Risha told the Americans that the Awakening could have only come from Iraqis. He rejected the idea that it could have originated with the U.S., because it would not have been accepted. Only locals in Anbar understood the situation, how the tribes and insurgents worked, and could convince others to join them in challenging the militants for power. Abdul Abu Risha also had an expansive vision. He did not just want to rid Anbar of Al Qaeda in Iraq, he wanted that to be his springboard to gain national acceptance into the country’s elite. The Abu Rishas were able to gain power in Anbar, but only found a small voice in Baghdad. In the 2010 elections he joined the Iraqi Unity List along with former Interior Minister Jawad Bolani’s Constitution Party. It only won four seats in parliament, and eventually joined with the Iraq Accordance Front in the Centrist Alliance, which then became part of Iyad Allawi’s Iraqi National Movement (INM) in 2011. That series of events showed that the Awakening had lost much of its standing after the 2009 vote. Its alliance with the INM didn’t work out either as it came out on the losing end of its long running battle with Premier Maliki. By 2012 Ahmed Abu Risha joined the Anbar protests, and became one of its main leaders. That has now run its course with few results, so Abu Risha will have to find a new way to fulfill his aspirations of transforming his local movement into a national one.


Allam, Hannah and al Dulaimy, Mohammed, “Marine-led Campaign Killed Friends and Foes, Iraqi Leaders Say,” Knight Ridder, 5/17/05

Al-Ansary, Khalid and Adeeb, Ali, “Most Tribes in Anbar Agree to Unite Against Insurgents,” New York Times, 9/18/06

Aswat al-Iraq, “Iraq’s Middle Alliance joins al-Iraqiya Coalition to form powerful Parliamentary opposition bloc, its MP says,” 8/2/11
- “Iraqi Accordance, Iraq Unity blocs form new alliance,” 10/10/10

BBC, “Obituary: Abdul Sattar Abu Risha,” 9/13/07

Carroll, Rory, “Al-Qaida in Iraq seizes border town as it mobilises against poll,” Guardian, 9/7/05

Eisenstadt, Lieutenant Colonel Michael, “Iraq Tribal engagement Lessons Learned,” Military Review, September-October 2007

Fairweather, Jack, “Leader’s ambitions worry Baghdad elite,” Financial Times, 4/18/08

Gordon, Michael, “Iraq Hampers U.S. Bid to Widen Sunni Police Role,” New York Times, 10/28/07

Inside Iraq, “Iraq’s Elections Results,” McClatchy Newspapers, 3/18/10

International Crisis Group, “Iraq’s Uncertain Future: Elections And Beyond,” 2/25/10

Knickmeyer, Ellen and Finer, Jonathan, “Iraqi Sunnis Battle To Defend Shiites,” Washington Post, 8/14/05

Kraul, Chris, “Sunni chiefs in Anbar join mainstream,” San Francisco Chronicle, 4/20/07

Kukis, Mark, “Turning Iraq’s Tribes Against Al-Qaeda,” Time, 12/26/06

McCary, John, “The Anbar Awakening: An Alliance of Incentives,” Washington Quarterly, January 2009

McWilliams, Chief Warrant Officer-4 Timothy, and Wheeler, Lieutenant Colonel Kurtis, ed., Al-Anbar Awakening Volume I, American Perspectives, U.S. Marines and Counterinsurgency in Iraq, 2004-2009, Virginia: Marine Corps University, 2009
- Al-Anbar Awakening Volume II, Iraqi Perspectives, From Insurgency to Counterinsurgency in Iraq, 2004-2009, Virginia: Marine Corps University, 2009

Michaels, Jim, “An Army colonel’s gamble pays off in Iraq,” USA Today, 4/30/07

Partlow, Joshua, “Sheiks Help Curb Violence in Iraq’s West, U.S. Says,” Washington Post, 1/27/07

Raghavan, Sudarasan, “Maliki, Petraeus Visit Insurgent Hotbed,” Washington Post, 3/14/07

Roads To Iraq, “Iraq pre-election political map – The Sunni scene,” 9/19/09

Roggio, Bill, “1920s Revolution Brigades turns on al Qaeda in Diyala,” Long War Journal, 6/12/07
- “Anbar Rising,” Long War Journal, 5/11/07
- “The Anbar Salvation Council goes expeditionary,” Long War Journal, 5/2/07
- “The Anbar Tribes vs. al Qaeda, Continued,” Long War Journal, 11/22/06

Sanders, Edmund, “Draft charter leaves many tough issues unsettled,” San Francisco Chronicle, 8/31/05

Schneider, Howard and Wright, Robin, “Sheik Risha Killed in Bomb Attack in Iraq,” Washington Post, 9/13/07

Tavernise, Sabrina, “Marines See Signs Iraq Rebels Are Battling Foreign Fighters,” New York Times, 6/21/05

Wong, Edward, “An Iraqi Tribal Chief Opposes the Jihadists, and Prays,” New York Times, 3/3/07


Anonymous said...

If Iraqi central government with all resources that had and offer by US and other countries ar not able to stop the cycle of daily killing for the last 10 years, each time still hearing Al-Qaeda in Iraq, Ba’athists with all that grape every day disputed the continuing news that Iraqi special polices arrested the TOP leaders of Al-Qaeda in \Iraq (Al-Qaeda's minster of defence!!, AL Qaeda’s minister of finance!!...etc..)
The question how Northern Regional Government have the ability to secure her place and cities from terrorist & Al-Qaeda attacks without Awakening style gorilla which shouldn’t been designed as far as their slogans to attach just Arab Iraqis from both factions?

Despite the central government have had all the resources and support and help from US.

Joel Wing said...

You have to remember that the KDP and PUK controlled their areas in Kurdistan since 1991. They'd already established security in their area years before the 2003 invasion, and made it easier for them to maintain it afterward. The central government on the other hand disintegrated after the fall of Saddam, the U.S. disbanded the military, the police fled, and the U.S. rebuilding effort was an initial failure and took years to straighten it out. Even then, the U.S. was starting almost from scratch, plus the security forces were split between all the different ruling parties. Finally, after Ansar al-Islam got kicked out of Kurdistan during the 03 invasion militants hardly targeted the region. It's pretty easy then to understand why the KRG was secure and the rest of the country was not.

Anonymous said...

I partially agree what you said.

The problem as you said generated by US with the dismantling Iraqi police and forces, There is no question that was a recipe of dissertator and chaos., however US miss of creating new Iraqi police units in addition Bremer accepting Badar and other militia as police forces was also a big mistake.

However if we try to convincing ourselves that the Iraqi parties with tangent militia, they should also have some already established security in their area years before the 2003 invasion, so that should made it easier for who in central government to maintain the security which the forces were belong to most of those parties.

As for Ansar al-Islam, I am talking here Al-Qaeda not branch of it, so one branch Ansar al-Islam, as they determent to destabilised Iraq they should carry their operation.

I am still hold the central government of neglecting the loss of lives every day without any action even use the experts from their northern regional expertise to help them to sort out the security matter.

Joel Wing said...

When the militias entered Iraq or emerged such as the Mahdi Army they did try to secure their own specific areas, but that's not going to work country wide because there's no cooperation, non-protected areas, etc. The U.S. on the other hand had neither the troops nor the tactics to deal with the insurgency until 2007 and the Surge. The Iraqi government was divided as well. The Interior Ministry for example was split between various different parties that didn't like each other. U.S. advisers had to walk through the Interior building in Baghdad with guards because they didn't trust some of the personnel in the Ministry.

Anonymous said...

You did not answered the question to the point.

What all you said its very obvious for most Iraqis the branches/ Militias that US brought to Iraq with full support of them were they were most interested to secure their own specific goals and leaders then they hold some area to claims were theirs.

As for The Interior Ministry oh give a break, what about those 100 Personal/Consultant in each ministry
who left behind Paul Bremer inside Iraq who hold the power to fire any Iraqi official even minsters

As for Iraq police please I refer you to this old truth by your follow citizen what the mess you created to reach today Iraq?
Donald Rumsfeld must be indicted over Iraq militias
Bernard B. Kerik

Joel Wing said...

By June 04 there were less than 100 advisers for Interior in the whole country. The mission for Interior was always undermanned.

As for the CPA it appointed the first batch of ministers but then gave that power to the Iraqi Governing Council who put in all their own people into office.

Kerik was a joke who did little in Iraq and left just as quickly as he came.

Joel Wing said...

Also your timeline is off. Badr didn't take over Interior and the commandos until 05 after the Iraqis had taken over the government.

Anonymous said...

Just recap to the point Why Al-Qaeda in all over Iraq but NOT in Northern Region "Kurdish Area"?

The Awakening forces cleared Iraq from them but here we go Al-Qaeda again on the ground in Iraq?

Is there on Al-Qaeda or different Al-Qaeda?

Who support Who?

Btw, what you said about Kerik was a joke, let tell you not just him the whole bunch of Americans and who worked in Iraq just all jokes,
End in today Iraq left in chaos handed to uncompetent, thuggish corrupted gangs.

Joel Wing said...

Anon said "Just recap to the point Why Al-Qaeda in all over Iraq but NOT in Northern Region "Kurdish Area"?"

I already answered that. The KRG had established security more than 10 years before the 2003 invasion. They were therefore more capable and prepared for Al Qaeda's terrorism when it started afterward.

Anon said "Is there one Al-Qaeda or different Al-Qaeda?"

There's Al Qaeda central in Afghanistan/Pakistan and then a whole bunch of groups affiliated with it. Zarqawi was not part of Al Qaeda initially but then allied with it and renamed his group Al Qaeda in Iraq to gain access to its brand and funding. Before that around 100-200 Al Qaeda fighters had fled to Kurdistan and camps run by Ansar al-Sunna after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. They got kicked out of Iraq into Iran by U.S. and Kurdish forces during the 2003 invasion. Today the Islamic State of Iraq is more directly connected to Al Qaeda central than Zarqawi was who was his own leader and not beholden to anyone else.

Anon said "Who support Who?"

Al Qaeda has all kinds of private supporters that contribute money to it. The Islamic State of Iraq also runs criminal enterprises throughout Iraq to fund itself such as extorting money from businesses, taxes on transportation through their areas, etc.

Anonymous said...

Al Qaeda has all kinds of private supporters that contribute money to it.

Yo stated every one but you covered the major funders?

Is it Your country funding them right now Syria?

What about very US very friendlily Monarchy in Gulf state that Big Fat Amer and Saudis?

If you did see or just in case your memory lost read here:

The gas-rich state of Qatar has spent as much as $3bn over the past two years supporting the rebellion in Syria, far exceeding any other government, but is now being nudged aside by Saudi Arabia as the prime source of arms to rebels.
Qatar bankrolls Syrian revolt with cash and arms -

A Veteran Saudi Power Player Works To Build Support to Topple Assad

Radical Muslim at White House?

Do you get your memory back?

Joel Wing said...

Anon said "Is it Your country funding them right now Syria?"

No, Obama administration did not authorize military aid to Syrian rebels until this summer, and nothing arrived until September. Its supposed to go Free Syrian Army and only in small amounts because U.S. is afraid some might go to Islamists. That's also reason why U.S. is mostly sending just light weapons like assault rifles and machine guns.

Anon said "What about very US very friendlily Monarchy in Gulf state that Big Fat Amer and Saudis?"

Yes, Gulf states are sending money to the Islamist parties in Syria. That's another reason why the U.S. has tried to stay out of Syria. It's a mess.