Two new public
opinion polls from the Spring of 2017 found that Iraqis still hold very
divergent views. What was a big change was that most Sunnis felt positive about
the country and the government, although they were still worried about the
Islamic State. Shiites on the other hand, showed high levels of pessimism,
while Kurds appeared to be done with the central government.
The results of the
two surveys were incomplete. One was done by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research
from March to April 2017, and included areas under Islamic State control. A
total of 1,338 people were questioned, 293 from Baghdad, 500 in southern Iraq,
363 in western Iraq including 200 in Mosul, and 184 in Kurdistan. The margin of
error was +/- 2.19%. The other was done by Almustakilla for Research in April
2017, but was only written about in the Washington Post. How many people were interviewed and where,
the questions asked, the margin of error, etc. were not mentioned, which is a
serious drawback when evaluating the results.
Several of the
questions and results were similar between the two. One was whether people
thought Iraq was going in the right direction. For Almustakilla for Research (AFR)
it found 51% of Sunnis, but only 36% of Shiites and 5% of Kurds believed Iraq
was on the right track. Those were very close to Greenberg Quinland Rosner
Research (GQRR) that had 39% replying right direction vs 59% wrong. Urban
areas, 41% right vs 57% wrong, were slightly more optimistic than rural regions,
32% right, 64% wrong, but showed general unhappiness with the country. By
region, west Iraq, which included Anbar and Ninewa were the most positive with
64% saying right direction, compared to Baghdad and the south, 62% each wrong,
and Kurdistan 95% wrong. GQRR also provided results for the question dating
back to November 2010. February 2012 had the highest positive results with 48%
saying right direction, and August 2016 had the biggest negative response with
82% saying wrong. Both AFR and GQRR show that while Sunni parts of Iraq are
feeling good about the country, but the majority (Shiites and Kurds) are not.
The Kurds have been increasingly unsatisfied with the central government since
Nouri al-Maliki’s rule (2006-2014), and have remained skeptical of Prime
Minister Haidar al-Abadi. This is due to arguments over the budget, the
Peshmerga, oil exports, and the disputed territories. Sunnis on the other hand,
appear to be happy that they were liberated from the Islamic State. Shiites are
the hardest to explain. One would think that they too would be happy with the
victories in the war against the militants, yet 2/3 have a negative view of
things. They continue to be victims of mass casualty terrorist attacks, the
Shiite political establishment is becoming more partisan and divisive, and
there is general cynicism about the government and its corruption and nepotism.
There may be other factors as well, but it’s hard to tell from the polling. Overall,
this marks a decided change in Iraqi opinion. Since 2003, Sunnis have
traditionally felt the most alienated and angry in the country as they lost
their dominant position in society and government with the overthrow of Saddam.
That was recently surpassed by the Kurds however after their falling out with
Maliki. Now the Shiites are generally unhappy.
Almustakilla for Research
Is Iraq going in the right direction?
Sunnis
|
51%
|
Shiites
|
36%
|
Kurds
|
5%
|
Greenberg Quinland Rosner Research
Do you think things in Iraq are going in the
right/wrong direction?
|
Right
|
Wrong
|
Overall
|
39%
|
59%
|
Urban
|
41%
|
57%
|
Rural
|
32%
|
64$
|
Baghdad
|
36%
|
62%
|
South
|
35%
|
62%
|
West
|
64%
|
34%
|
Kurdistan
|
3%
|
95%
|
Do you think things in Iraq are going in the
right/wrong direction?
Month
|
Right
|
Wrong
|
Nov
2010
|
45%
|
44%
|
April
2011
|
41%
|
50%
|
September
2011
|
37%
|
50%
|
February
2012
|
48%
|
44%
|
December
2012
|
40%
|
54%
|
November
2013
|
31%
|
65%
|
April
2014
|
41%
|
51%
|
March
2015
|
34%
|
55%
|
August
2015
|
26%
|
65%
|
January
2016
|
10%
|
82%
|
April
2017
|
39%
|
59%
|
Another question in
both surveys was whether people supported Prime Minister Abadi or not. For AFR
71% of Sunnis said yes as well as 62% of Shiites. That compared to 59% of all
respondents being for the PM vs 38% disapproving in the GQRR poll. By region,
78% of west Iraq approved the most of the premier, followed by 64% in Baghdad,
57% in South Iraq, and only 18% in Kurdistan. Abadi’s approval rating actually
slipped from 75% in January 2015, down to 65% in August 2015, to a low of 33%
in January 2016 before rebounding to 59% in April 2017 according to GQRR. What
accounts for the dramatic swing in Abadi’s standing? When he first came into
office, many were happy simply because he was not Maliki. He started coming
down to earth after that, especially in 2015-16 as his government appeared in
disarray as there were growing protests demanding reform, which were co-opted
by Moqtada al-Sadr. Abadi also presented a reform program, which turned out to
really be about saving money due to Iraq’s financial crisis after oil prices
slipped. The PM then changed course and tied himself to the military victories
against the Islamic State, which account for his renewed popularity this year. The
Kurds are the one exception, as they held an overwhelmingly negative view of
anyone running Baghdad.
Almustakilla for Research
Do you support Prime Minister Haidar Abadi?
Sunnis
|
71%
|
Shiites
|
62%
|
Greenberg Quinland Rosner Research
Do you approve/disapprove of Prime Minister
Haidar Abadi?
|
Approve
|
Disapprove
|
Jan
15
|
75%
|
19%
|
Aug
15
|
65%
|
29%
|
Jan
16
|
33%
|
63%
|
Apr
17
|
59%
|
38%
|
|
Baghdad
|
South
|
West
|
Kurdistan
|
Jan
15
|
93%
|
85%
|
68%
|
28%
|
Aug
15
|
85%
|
83%
|
48%
|
16%
|
Jan
16
|
52%
|
33%
|
24%
|
15%
|
Apr
17
|
64%
|
57%
|
78%
|
18%
|
While in the first
two questions the AFR and GQRR results were generally the same, that was not
true when Iraqis were asked whether they believed the Islamic State would make
a return. 61% of Sunnis and 38% of Shiites believed it would according to AFR,
vs 58% of total respondents saying yes and 40% saying no to GQRR. One thing was
the wording was different between the two countries. AFR asked if IS would
comeback in their cities, while GQRR was more general and asked if the
insurgents would re-emerge in the country. AFR might have also asked Kurds what
they thought, but that was not included. GQRR found that 91% of Kurdistan and
74% of Baghdad respondents feared a militant comeback compared to 44% in south
Iraq, and 49% in the west. This could be one difference between the two polls
as west Iraq includes the majority Sunni provinces of Anbar and Ninewa, but it
was not completely comparable as there are plenty of Sunnis spread out in other
parts of the nation.
Almustakilla for Research
Will the Islamic State return to your city?
Sunnis
|
61%
|
Shiites
|
38%
|
Greenberg Quinland Rosner Research
Are you concerned about ISIS and other groups
re-emerging in Iraq?
|
Very/Somewhat
|
Little/Not
|
Total
|
58%
|
40%
|
Baghdad
|
74%
|
25%
|
South
|
44%
|
55%
|
West
|
49%
|
50%
|
Kurdistan
|
91%
|
6%
|
The last similarity
between AFR and GQRR was what Iraqis thought should happen to the Hashd
al-Shaabi. For AFR 45% of Sunnis and 42% of Shiites believed that the Hashd
should be integrated into the army. 35% of Sunnis thought they should be
disbanded, while only 5% of Shiites shared that idea. There might have been
other responses, but the results of the poll were not discussed unfortunately.
In the GQRR results, 40% of all respondents thought the Hashd should be
dissolved or integrated into the army. 23% thought it should be given more
power as a separate member of the security forces, 16% said the Hashd should be
disbanded, 7% said they should return to their own provinces, 7% thought they
should remain in areas contested by IS, and 5% said they should be in areas
where the insurgents were not present. Again, the two surveys were roughly the
same with 40% of so thinking that the Hashd should become part of the security
forces. At the same time, they are not completely congruent as GQRR included
the Kurds, which were vary anti-Hashd with only 2% having a favorable view of
the force. The Hashd have been at the forefront of the war against the Islamic
State, although they have been relegated to more of a support role in the major
battles since Tikrit due to the maneuverings of PM Abadi who wanted the army
and police to be in the lead to increase the standing of his government. The
Hashd also has a sizeable Sunni contingent, especially if the Tribal Hashd are
included. They have an overwhelmingly positive standing amongst Shiite as they
are considered the saviors of the country after the Iraqi forces collapsed in
2014. Thus 60% of west Iraq, 90% of Baghdad, and 100% of the south had a
favorable view of the Hashd according to GQRR. The Kurds were the one exception
with 76% having an unfavorable view, since many believed the Hashd were a
sectarian force that threatened the disputed areas in places like Kirkuk,
Salahaddin, and Diyala.
Almustakilla for Research
What should be the future of the Hashd?
|
Integrated into army
|
Disbanded
|
Sunnis
|
45%
|
35%
|
Shiites
|
42%
|
5%
|
Greenberg Quinland Rosner Research
What do you think should be done with the
Hashd after Iraq liberated from ISIS?
Dissolved
or Integrated into army
|
40%
|
Given
more power as separate military force
|
23%
|
Disbanded
|
16%
|
Remain
as is but return to their own provinces
|
7%
|
Remain
as is but stay only in areas contested by IS
|
7%
|
Remain
as is deployed to provinces not contested by IS
|
5%
|
How would you rate your feelings towards the
Hashd?
|
Favorable
|
Unfavorable
|
Change vs Jan 2016
|
Total
|
74%
|
19%
|
7%
|
Baghdad
|
90%
|
6%
|
-4%
|
South
|
100%
|
0%
|
+2%
|
West
|
60%
|
28%
|
+22%
|
Kurdistan
|
2%
|
76%
|
0%
|
The biggest take
away from both public opinion polls was the positive feelings amongst Sunnis.
The last time that community was so optimistic was probably in 2009 when Sunnis
came out in force to participate in the provincial elections. That included a
number of insurgent groups who finally felt that they could have a say in the
Iraqi government. That opportunity was lost with the policies of Prime Minister
Maliki who went after all of his opponents, especially the Sunni parties and
the Sahwa that were created by the United States during the Surge. This time
there might be a more profound change amongst them. In 2014, there were a
variety of insurgent groups and tribes that believed they could work with the
Islamic State against the Maliki regime. They were all fooling themselves about
cooperating with IS as it quickly pushed out all the other groups to where they
are no longer even active. IS rule proved harsh and deadly as thousands were
killed and imprisoned. This has almost completely discredited the militants’
brand. Prime Minister Abadi has also made it a priority to liberate these
areas, increase his standing and win over Sunnis to the government. The
question is can this be sustained? Outside of military victories, Abadi has
little else to offer. The government is still in the midst of a huge budget
deficit, and can barely rebuild all of the territory it has re-taken. How Abadi
deals with these issues will largely determine whether he can maintain Sunni
support. He also has to shore up his own base, while he’s completely lost the
Kurds who are increasingly disinterested in most things going on in Baghdad.
SOURCES
Al-Dagher, Munqith
and Kaltenthaler, Karl, “A striking positive shift in Sunni opinion in Iraq is
underway. Here’s what it means,” Washington Post, 9/14/17
Greenberg Quinlan
Rosner Research, “Improved Security Provides Opening for Cooperation, March –
April 2017 Survey Findings,” May 2017
1 comment:
Interesting article and thanks.
It is time that the polling organization and other Iraqi observers to stop including Kurds and Kurdistan as part of Iraq. It is best if they would separate and be able to concentrate on their own affairs. The last thing you want in the middle east are large heterogeneous countries that is perpetually at war with itself. Witness Syria and Lebanon. If the geography allows, that is if an ethnicity is primarily concentrated in one region, it should quickly be separated so they can stand on their own feet and address their own problems, which is a lot more simpler in a nation building drive, than to try to solve multiple complex interrelated problems when ethnicities are pigeon holed into one area.
Nationalism is the bane of civil society, as Baathism has proved over and over again. That is why the Kurds should be separated in Turkey and even in Iran. Sunnis may wish to separate in Iraq, but the oil resources will then remain in Shiite hands.
Post a Comment