The September 2012 issue of the journal Health had two
articles about the medical situation in Iraq’s Fallujah in Anbar province. One
was about infant mortality rates, “Perinatal and neonatal mortality in Fallujah General Hospital, Fallujah City, Anbar Province, west of Iraq,” and the
other was on cancer, “Incidence of cancer in Fallujah above 10 years age with over view of common cancers in 2011.” The two papers both found a worsening
health situation in the city. A likely culprit could be the U.S. invasion and
the intense fighting that took place in Fallujah. However, the reports were
very circumspect to point blame in that direction. “Incidence of cancer” for
instance, believed that the increased cases found in the study could be because
of better diagnosis, reporting, and changes in population, although the
military operations could be a cause as well. Likewise, “Perinatal and neonatal
mortality in Fallujah General Hospital” thought the decade long sanctions
deprived Iraq of the necessary medical equipment and money to maintain the
country’s health system. Whatever the speculation may be, both pieces found
more cancer and infant mortality rates in Fallujah since 2003, which is
troubling enough trends even if the root reason for them remains unclear.
(Wikipedia) |
“Incidence of cancer in Fallujah above 10 years age with
over view of common cancers in 2011” found higher rates of the disease in the
city than in the rest of Iraq, and neighboring countries. The study looked at
all cases of cancer from January 1 to December 31, 2011 in Fallujah and three
of its sub-districts, excluding leukemia. This was the first look at the
disease in the city since the 2003 invasion. It got its data from the Fallujah
General Hospital, Al-Janabi Hospital, Amyrea Hospital, private health centers
in downtown Fallujah and three sub-districts, a histopathology lab, private
clinics, and the oncology center in Ramadi. Of the approximate 600,000 people
in those four areas, the report found cancer in 27.2% of them. That broke down
to an incident rate of 96 per 100,000 overall, with 92.6 for men and 99.4 for
women. Fallujah city center had the largest amount of cases at 128 per 100,000,
with the western district of Saqlawiya second at 82. The lowest rate was found
in the eastern district of Karmah at 50 per 100,000. The two most common forms
of the disease reported were breast and lung cancer. The overall rate of 96 per
100,000 was three times higher than that reported for the city in 2002, which
was 34.5 per 100,000. It was also higher than the rate for all of Iraq at that
time, 63 per 100,000. The same was true when comparing Fallujah to some other
countries in the region. In Qatar for instance, the cancer rate was 63.1 per
100,000, 67.2 in Jordan, and 71.7 in Saudi Arabia. Only Iran, at 98 per 100,000
for females, and 103 for males was worse. The study speculated on many possible
reasons for why such a high cancer rate was found in the city. The first was
the two Battles of Fallujah, which took place in 2004. The authors thought that
might be why there were much higher rates in the central area of the city, then
in its sub-districts. At the same time, there were many other possibilities.
Those included better diagnosis, improved reporting, and changes in the
population. With the paper only focusing upon the cases of cancer reported, no
direct correlation could be made with any of those causes.
Cancer Rates In
Fallujah And 3 Sub-Districts 2011
Central Fallujah 128 per 100,000
Saqlawiya 82 per 100,000
Amyrea 66 per 100,000
Karmah 50 per 100,000
Overall 96 per 100,000
Cancer Rates In
Fallujah vs Selected Middle Eastern Countries
Fallujah 96 per 100,000
Iran 100.5 per 100,000
Saudi Arabia 71.7 per 100,000
Jordan 67.2 per 100,000
Qatar 63.1 per 100,000
“Perinatal and neonatal mortality in Fallujah General
Hospital, Fallujah City, Anbar Province, west of Iraq” wanted to determine the
state of Fallujah’s health services after the U.S. occupation by looking at
infant mortality rates. It looked at data collected at the Fallujah General
Hospital’s intensive care unit from January 1 to December 31, 2010. The study
included 290 neonatal deaths and 64 stillbirths. Those established a perinatal
mortality rate of 50.3 per 1,000 live births, and a neonatal mortality rate of
41.5 per 1,000 live births. The latter was lower than the rate reported by the
hospital from 2007-2009, which was 57.3, but higher than the national rate in
2009 of 23 per 1,000 live births. Fallujah’s neonatal mortality rate was also
considerably higher than several neighboring countries including Qatar, 4 per
1,000, the United Arab Emirates, 5 per 1,000, Kuwait and Bahrain, 6 per 1,000,
Oman, 7 per 1,000, Lebanon, 8 per 1,000, Libya, 9 per 1,000, Tunisia and Saudi
Arabia, 12 per 1,000, Jordan and Egypt, 13 per 1,000, Iran, 19 per 1,000, Morocco,
23 per 1,000, Yemen, 32 per 1,000, and Djibouti, 35 per 1,000. Only Sudan at 41
per 1,000 was close. What troubled the authors was that Fallujah General
Hospital is one of the best in Anbar, and is known for its equipment and staff.
Despite that, it still had a very poor record of taking care of pregnant mothers.
In Europe and America, infant mortality rates have gone down, because of better
technology and treatments. The paper believed that the international sanctions
imposed on Iraq in 1990 for its invasion of Kuwait, and the eight-year
occupation by the United States caused a decline in the country’s health
services. Those two events deprived the country of the advances that occurred
in Europe and America, and can now be seen in many nations in the region. What
the authors advocated for was more spending on Iraq’s health care services, so
that it could make up for what it lost over the last twenty years.
Neonatal Mortality
Rate Fallujah vs Selected Regional Countries
Fallujah 41.5 per 1,000 live births
Sudan 41 per 1,000 live births
Djibouti 35 per 1,000 live births
Yemen 32 per 1,000 live births
Morocco 23 per 1,000 live births
Iran 19 per 1,000 live births
Egypt 13 per 1,000 live births
Jordan 13 per 1,000 live births
Saudi Arabia 12 per 1,000 live births
Tunisia 12 per 1,000 live births
Libya 9 per 1,000 live births
Lebanon 8 per 1,000 live births
Oman 7 per 1,000 live births
Bahrain 6 per 1,000 live births
Kuwait 6 per 1,000 live births
UAE 5 per 1,000 live births
Qatar 4 per 1,000 live births
These two papers were important to add scientific data to
Fallujah’s health situation. The city has been the focus of many news reports
for its poor state of affairs, but they were mostly based upon anecdotal
stories. These studies add specific data to that more general picture. They
found large numbers of cancer cases and infant mortalities, which were above
many other countries in the Middle East and North Africa. Those were disturbing
figures. The causes were pure speculation, because there was no attempt to make
a direct correlation between any included in the papers. Many articles have
pointed the finger at the two Battles of Fallujah in 2004. Those could very
well be the reasons why health has deteriorated in the city, but there are
other possibilities as well. The cancer report for instance, pointed to a
decline in spending for health services that occurred in the last twenty years,
while the mortality rate paper also pointed to better reporting and diagnosis.
Further studies will have to be made before a clearer picture emerges of what
has led Fallujah to have such poor health conditions.
SOURCES
Abdul Ghani, Samira T., Sirhan, Yaseen Taha, Lawas, Abdul
Sattar Kadhem, “Perinatal and neonatal mortality in Fallujah General Hospital,
Fallujah City, Anbar Province, west of Iraq,” Health, September 2012
Al-Faluji, Abdul Wahab A.R., Ali, Salih Hussein, Al-Esawi,
Arkan A. Jasem, “Incidence of cancer in Fallujah above 10 years age with over
view of common cancers in 2011,” Health, September 2012
2 comments:
Sorry, anonymous. I accidentally deleted your comment by hitting the wrong button! I agree however that there are probably other environmental factors that could contribute to the poor health in Fallujah.
Post a Comment