Officially, Iraq’s government has committed itself to
diversifying its economy away from being dependent upon oil, and wants to
create a vibrant private sector. In practice however, Iraq’s politicians always
turn to the state to solve any problems. That is seen in how the central and
regional governments have dealt with the high unemployment rate in the country.
With Iraq having one of the youngest populations in the Middle East and North
Africa there is constant pressure to create new jobs. The authorities have
responded to this dilemma by creating more and more government positions each
year. The fact that many of these workers do little to nothing is not a
concern, because politicians are more worried that they may lose votes if they
don’t give their followers part of the ever-expanding state pie, and that the
public may turn against the government if the jobless rate were to increase.
This has an adverse affect upon Iraq’s future, because not only does it draw
away workers from private companies, but takes away money that needs to be
invested into infrastructure and diversification.
One of the main goals of the 2013 draft budget is to create
more jobs. A government official said in February that the bill includes100,000 new positions. He said these would mostly be offered to university
graduates, and families that had lost loved ones to terrorism. Deputy Premier
Saleh al-Mutlaq complained that since so many ministries and government offices
lacked trained staff, and around 500,000 university graduates were unemployed,
the budget should offer even more chances to work. He suggested 130,000 jobs in
the second half of the year. Overall, Baghdad has plans to create 5 million new jobs by 2017 as part of its development plan. This is supposed to come from
a combination of public and private sources, along with foreign companies. In
practice, almost all new work opportunities have come from the state. As Labor
Minister Nassar Rubaie pointed out last year, the private sector is too small in Iraq to solve the labor problem. He said that only the government had
the means to address the issue. That’s exactly what it has done in every budget
since 2005. In 2012, for example, Baghdad wanted to create 100,000 new jobs. In
Kurdistan, the government hired 25,000 people in 2011, and was supposed to add
an additional 40,000 in 2012. This was supposed to help with the 16% unemployment rate, which Labor Minister Rubaie said the government wanted
to cut in half.
The government is already the largest employer in Iraq.
There are around 5 million public workers, half of which are in the security
forces. The state provides 60% of full time work. The number of public
employees has more than doubled since 2003. State workers as a percentage
of overall employment went from 28% in 2005 to 43% in 2008, which is one of the
highest rates per capita in the world. This huge increase in positions has been
paid for by oil revenue. (1) At the same time, the growth in pay and pensions
for all these workers has become the largest expenditure in the budget. A
parliamentarian pointed out that the 2013 draft budget is for 138 trillion
dinars, 83 trillion of which would go to past and present public employees.
This cuts into spending for more important things like diversifying the
economy. The problem is Iraqi politicians are worried about the political
repercussions if they don’t hire more people. 64% of the country is younger
than 24 years old, and they are the fast growing part of the population. They
have the highest unemployment rate, at 30% according to the United Nations.
Around 250,000 new people entered the labor market each year from 2007-2011,
and that’s expected to increase to 290,000 each year from 2012-2016. The
leadership is afraid that if they don’t get all these young people jobs it
could lead to instability. They also want their votes. The result is that the
government ends up hiring far more people than it actually needs, and many do
little to nothing as a consequence. This ends up hurting the long-term health
of the economy in two ways. First, every new public employee, pay increase, and
pension takes money away from investment in infrastructure and other needed
capital outlays. Second, it distorts the labor market. Since government jobs
are more secure and pay higher, they attract people away from the private
sector, and retard its growth. That contradicts the stated goals of the
National Development Plan, which is to create a healthy market economy. The
problem is that Iraq’s elite thinks short-term too often, and makes political
rather than economic decisions.
Iraq’s leaders have all grown up under command economies,
and have maintained that system since 2003. They give lip service to developing
the private sector, but in practice they think about what might happen
politically if they don’t create more jobs each year, and turn to the
government as a result. With such vast oil wealth, they think the easiest
solution is to simply create more public positions each year in the budget.
They don’t think what Iraq’s economy needs long-term, which is to move away
from the state-centric model. Instead, their policies distort the economy, and
make it harder for reforms to be implemented. Politicians’ short-term thinking
is leading to long-term development problems. There appears to be little
political will to break this pattern, and the result will be a continued
reliance upon oil to fund a state-run economy.
FOOTNOTES
1. Niqash, “iraq’s unemployed youth: dream jobs turn to
nightmares in Baghdad,” 3/8/12
SOURCES
Ibrahim, Haider, “Finance Ministry discusses adding 42,000
jobs to the 2012 budget,” AK News, 1/16/12
Jawad, Laith, “Iraqi government to create 40,000 new jobs,”
Azzaman, 7/4/12
Kadhem, Adel, “Iraq to reduce unemployment by half by 2014,”
Azzaman, 2/18/12
Mohammed, Fryad, “Labor Ministry: Unemployment will be down
to zero by 2016,” AK News, 8/5/12
Niqash, “iraq’s unemployed youth: dream jobs turn to
nightmares in Baghdad,” 3/8/12
Al-Qaisi, Mohammed, “Iraqi government announces creation of
100,000 jobs,” Al-Shorfa, 2/1/13
Al Sayegh, Hadeel, “Iraqi in plan for 5 million jobs in next
five years,” The National, 9/23/12
Al-Shaher, Omar, “Five Million State Employees Drag Down
Iraqi Economy,” Al-Monitor, 1/9/13
Tashan, Sleman, “Graduates have a hard time finding jobs,”
Kurdish Globe, 5/21/12
Tijara Provincial Economic Growth Program, “Assessment of
Current and Anticipated Economic Priority In Iraq,” United States Agency for
International Development, 10/4/12
Wasty, Sulaiman, “Private Sector Development in Iraq:
Continuing Constraints,” Middle East Institute, 7/26/12
2 comments:
I seem to remember that the CPA had talked about privatizing the state sector early in the occupation, but once the priority shifted to trying to keep the whole country from spiraling into chaos and mayhem that took a back seat. Was there any way that the CPA could have shifted Iraq to a free market in your opinion?
I think transforming Iraq into a market economy will take decades. It's not even assured how much they will move in that direction. The CPA simply wasn't capable of that type of transformation, because it was a short-term organization. Plus the free market policies it did follow were ill advised and poorly planned like ending tariffs which opened up the country to cheap imports that destroyed a lot of domestic businesses. A country like Iraq which had been under sanctions for 10 years was in no state to compete with other countries at the time. Shock therapy was going to do nothing but bad things in Iraq.
Post a Comment