(Iraqi News) |
Aid groups in Iraq were hoping that with the end of the war against the Islamic State most of the country’s displaced (IDPs) would go home. In fact, the exact opposite happened, people heading home has actually slowed. The crisis may now be shifting to a situation where a sizeable population will remain displaced for the foreseeable future. A recent report by the International Organization for Migration, Returns Working Group, and Social Inquiry attempted to break down the trends in displacement in Iraq since 2014, and to discover what issues were responsible for keeping people in their predicament.
Displacement in Iraq happened in waves and under different
circumstances, which has effected the fate of those forced to flee. One
difference was how people were displaced. The first wave happened when the
Islamic State began seizing control of territory, first in Anbar, and then in
Mosul and Tikrit in 2014. Anbar and Ninewa had the most people flee as a
result. Most of those went to urban areas like Baghdad, Irbil, Dohuk, etc. The
second wave came when the government began liberating areas from IS. The
freeing of Mosul for example didn’t begin until 2016. Many of those were
directed towards camps. That also meant returns happened over the last four
years, again in waves as different areas were freed. Ninewa is a perfect
example of these different trends as it had two major waves of displacement,
first in 2014 and then in 2016-17, and then people only began going back in
2017-18. There have also been differences in return patterns with most people
in Anbar back in their home areas, while very few have done so in Ninewa.
Again, because Anbar was freed in 2015 it allowed for early returns, while
Ninewa wasn’t cleared of IS until 2017.
Today there are 1.9 million people still displaced, and aid
groups are worried that many will remain in that situation. As of September
2018 54% of people have been IDPs for three or more years. The remaining 46%
have been displaced for up to three years. There are different reasons for
people remaining IDPs. One trend is that people displaced earlier in the war
are less likely to return. One reason is that many of them went to Kurdistan,
Baghdad and the south and gained a quality of life they are now unwilling to
give up.
The latest surveys of IDPs show that few are planning on
making the trip home. For those outside of camps, 65% said they wanted to
remain where they were, 22% were undecided, 12% said they planned to return,
and 1% wanted to move within or out of Iraq. For those in camps, 62% said they would
stay where they were, 28% were undecided, 9% wanted to go home, 1% wanted to
move without or out of Iraq. The average of the two was 64% wanted to stay put,
24% were undecided, 11% were going to return, and 1% wanted to move within Iraq
or out of the country. Those figures also vary depending upon the area. For
instance, those in Diyala and Baghdad are less willing to go back than the
average. The situation in home areas also plays a large role. Areas with large
housing destruction or illegal occupation have lower rates of returns. The
reasons for the destruction of property was another issue. Many homes were
destroyed on purpose for instance by the security forces while others were
damaged during the fighting. Whether there are jobs and services, whether
people fear discrimination or conflicts, whether there were demographic changes
in home regions, whether people were banned or not for their ties to the
insurgency, trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were also major
issues.
What the three aid groups found was that IDPs are not a
monolithic group. There are all different kinds of trends and circumstances
that have affected their situations that are keeping people displaced. Some
don’t want to go back because they have started new lives in different parts of
the country. Others fear what might happen to them if they go back or have nowhere
to return to because their homes are destroyed. Whatever the situation, many of
the 1.9 million IDPs do not look like they would be going back to their
original areas anytime soon. The same thing happened after the civil war with
over one million remaining displaced. While IDP groups are trying their best to
help people return and provide them with assistance, it is the Iraqi government
that has the most resources and can affect the situation the most. The problem
is the state’s policies are uncoordinated, there is a lack of planning, and
funding. The reconstruction effort is going through the same dilemma leaving
many areas, especially rural ones destroyed, which deters further returns.
SOURCED
International
Organization for Migration, Returns Working Group Iraq, Social Inquiry,
“Reasons To Remain: Categorizing Protracted Displacement In Iraq,” November
2018
No comments:
Post a Comment