(Shafaaq News) |
The group PAX released a survey on security in Iraq in July 2019. It interviewed 1,429 people in Basra, Kirkuk and Salahaddin. The last two were post-war zones, while Basra provided the perspective of Iraqis not directly involved in the conflict. It found that people generally thought the country was better off, although there was some trepidation about the future.
In general, respondents felt better about their safety. When
asked how would you rate your personal security 60% said they were safer versus
40% who said the opposite. When asked why, 92% said they felt less exposed to
attacks, 76% said they saw fewer weapons, 53% said they could travel more, and
48% said they could leave their home feeling safe. 65% told the survey teams
this situation was unchanged from 2018, with only 14% saying things had gotten
worse. Two years after the war against the Islamic State ended, and with
attacks at the lowest level in the country since 2003 these responses should
not be surprising. Even in Kirkuk and Salahaddin where the militants were still
active, they are limited mostly to rural areas, and do not affect most of the
population.
How would you
rate your personal security situation?
Generally feel safe
33%
I almost always feel
safe 27%
I generally feel
unsafe 26%
I almost always feel
unsafe 14%
Safe Total 60%
Unsafe total 40%
Why did your security
situation improve?
I feel less exposed
to violence 92%
I see fewer weapons
76%
I can move
easily/travel 53%
I leave my home more
48%
I am asked less
often for papers 22%
I feel fewer worries
19%
I have better access
to? 16?
None of the above
15?
How did your
security situation change compared to 2018?
It has not changed
65%
It improved 21%
It got worse 14%
When talking about their futures there were some mixed
views. When asked in the next year did they think they would be a victim of
violence 62% said somewhat likely, 19% said very likely, 16% said somewhat
unlikely, and 3% said very unlikely. However, 59% said they thought their
security situation would stay the same in the next year, 23% said there was a
chance for improvement with only 16% saying it could get worse. When asked who
might be possible victims, 56% said that some people were more likely to be
exposed to violent than others versus 39% who said all people were possible
targets. When questioned about why they might be exposed to violence, 488
people said they could get caught in a random incident, 56 people said because
of their gender, 51% said because their families had been threatened and
targeted, 34% said ethnosectarian identity, 32% said they didn’t know and 21%
said because of their relationship with the security forces. This showed while
people were generally happy with the current situation in their province, they
believed that things could change. 81% believed there was a chance they could
be affected by violence, most likely in a random event. On the other hand, 82%
said their situation would either stay the same or even get better. With Iraq
having faced years of war it’s understandable that people would believe instability
could return. Most didn’t seem to think that would happen in the immediate
future.
In the next year
do you think it is likely you will become a victim of violence?
Somewhat likely 62%
Very likely 19%
Somewhat unlikely
16%
Very unlikely 3%
What do you think
will happen with your security situation in the next year?
59% remain the same
23% improve a little
9% will become a
little worse
7% will become much
worse
Which statement
do you agree with most?
Some people are more
like than others to be exposed to violence 56%
All people are
equally likely to be exposed to violence 39%
I don’t know 4%
Why do you expect
to become a victim of violence?
I could get caught
up in a random act 448
Because of my gender
56
Family members have
been threatened/targeted 51
Because of my
ethnoreligious identity 34
I don’t know 32
Because of my
relationship to security forces 21
Other 9
When asked about future conflicts, most appeared to believe
that the economic and political situations were the most troublesome. When
asked which issue would most likely lead to conflicts in the future 22% said
economics, 13% said politics, 12% said social issues, and 51% said all of the
above. When asked what topics in their community could lead to problems in the
next year there were similar results with 412 people picking lack of services,
394 saying poverty and lack of opportunities, 366 said poor national
governance, 272 said fighting between tribes, 230 said competition over
resources, 226 said poor local governance, 200 said ethnosectarian fighting, 46
said displacement and 26 said involvement of foreign forces. Finally, when
asked what changes could be made to bring about lasting peace economics again
dominated with 473 picking economic development, 408 said political reform, 407
said disarmament, 231 had improved justice, 196 said better security forces,
131 selected reconciliation, 114 had military suppression of the insurgency.
With the war over Iraqis are becoming more focused upon the government, and are
not happy. Services are notoriously poor, the government is largely ineffective
and corrupt, and unemployment amongst the young is high. The state has a bad
record in dealing with all of these meaning change is unlikely and frustration
with it will grow.
In general, which
of the following do you believe is most likely to cause conflict in future?
Economics 22%
Politics 13%
Social 12%
All of these 51%
What factors are
most likely to cause further conflict in your community in the next year?
Lack of services 412
Poverty/lack of
opportunities 394
Poor governance at
national level 366
Fighting between
tribes 272
Competition over
resources 230
Poor governance at
provincial, district, local level 226
Fighting between
ethnosectarian groups 200
Migration/displacement
46
Involvement of
international forces 26
What are the most
significant changes that need to happen to bring lasting peace to Iraq?
Economic development
473
Political reform 408
Disarmament 407
Improved justice 231
Better ISF 196
Improved community
relations through reconciliation 131
Military suppression
of insurgency 114
Involvement of women
in peacebuilding 53
More U.N. 27
I don’t know 24
Independent or
autonomy for certain regions 23
More involvement of
international forces 20
Finally, when the security forces were brought up the police
and army were held in higher regard than the Hashd al-Shaabi. When asked who
would you first contact if a family member was killed 574 said the police, 447
said a local leader, 339 said family and friends, 178 said the army, 44 said
the Hashd, 33 said a lawyer, while 23 would handle it themselves. The police
(696 people) had a larger presence than any other force like the army (510 people),
the Hashd (354 people) or armed political parties (193 people) in people’s
areas. Finally, the police were trusted the most (586 people) followed by the
army (426 people), and the Hashd (240 people). Police are drawn from the local
population, and should be in charge of local security, which accounts for their
high standing in the poll. The responses are also interesting because there was
a lot of derision of the army and police in 2014 after their collapsed in the
face of the Islamic State. The Hashd al-Shaabi were seen as citizen fighters
taking up arms to protect their country. That was mostly from southern Iraq,
but local forces were eventually organized in the war zones as well. At least
in Basra, Kirkuk, and Salahaddin the Hashd were only around half as popular as
the regular Iraqi forces.
Who would you
first contact in the case of a family member being killed?
Police 574
Local leader 447
Family/friends 339
Army 178
Hashd 44
Lawyer 33
Resolve it myself 23
Are the following
actors present in your area?
Police 696
Army 510
Hashd 354
Armed political
parties 193
International forces
9
Which of these
actors do you generally trust the most?
Police 586
Army 426
Hashd 240
I don’t know 68
Refused to answer 14
Armed political
parties 7
International forces
7
SOURCES
PAX, “Human Security
Survey: Iraq,” July 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment