The Iraqi National Movement (INM) was formed before the 2010
parliamentary elections with Iyad Allawi as its leader to challenge Prime
Minister Nouri al-Maliki and his State of Law. The INM, otherwise known as
Iraqiya, was always a divided list, because it was made up of so many different
parties and individuals with divergent views. As soon as negotiations started
for a new government, Iraqiya began to fracture. In the latest episode, Deputy
Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq, and several ministers decided to return to the
cabinet, breaking a boycott by the INM. Mutlaq and the others claimed they were
returning to win concessions for the protesters in Anbar, Ninewa, and other
provinces, but the real reason is because they have compromised with the prime
minister, and are attempting to position themselves before April’s provincial
vote. The rest of Iraqiya immediately condemned their actions. This could mark
the end of the list, which has had such a troubled history since its birth.
Deputy Premier Mutlaq’s decision to break his list’s boycott
of the cabinet might have led to the final break up of the Iraqi National
Movement (Reuters)
The latest crisis within the Iraqi National Movement started
when Deputy Premier Saleh al-Mutlaq and two other ministers from the list
attended a cabinet session despite a boycott. On March 26, 2013, Mutlaq,
Education Minister Mohammed Tamim and Industry Minister Ahmad Nasser al-Dalli
Karbuli returned to the cabinet. They discussed the demands of the
protesters from Anbar, Ninewa, and other provinces, and were included in a
special committee dealing with the matter. Afterward, Mutlaq announced that the
government had agreed to meet all the major demands of the demonstrators
including passing an amnesty law, releasing prisoners, amending arrest
procedures, ending the use of secret informers, and changing the Accountability
and Justice Law. This broke a three-month old boycott by Iraqiya that started
in December 2012 to protest the arrest of former Finance Minister Rafi Issawi’s
bodyguards. Mutlaq was convinced to return after he was invited to dinner by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The deputy premier’s relationship with
Maliki has gone back and forth from confrontation to reconciliation. In
December 2011, Mutlaq gave an interview to CNN where he called the prime minister a dictator, and he responded by calling for a no confidence vote
to remove his deputy from office. The
two then cut a political deal, and Mutlaq returned to his work in May 2012. Then in December 2012, the deputy prime minister came out for the protests in
Anbar, and said he was resigning to support them in January 2013. That argument
only lasted two months as the two have reconciled once again. Mutlaq has no
real power within the government, so Maliki could simply wait out his protests.
His deputy had more to lose out of office, because he would lose out on the
patronage networks and money that every politician in the government gets
access to. It was no surprise then that Mutlaq would come back into the fold
after each flare up. The reaction it caused was also predictable.
Mutlaq’s latest actions might have caused a fatal blow to
the National Movement. Iraqi National Movement lawmaker Ahmed Alwani accused Mutlaq of betraying his party, and the protests in Anbar. Haidar al-Mullah,
the spokesman for the deputy premier’s Iraqi National Dialogue Front responded
that Iraqiya was dead. He claimed that former Finance Minister Rafi Issawi and
Speaker of Parliament Osama Nujafi had taken over the list, and were taking it
towards an Islamist program instead of a nationalist one. He added that the
constant absence of Iraqiya leader Iyad Allawi was another major factor.
Lawmaker Mishan al-Saadi of the Dialogue Front also told the press that the
National Movement was no longer. When Mutlaq cut a deal with Maliki back in May
2012 to return to his job his decision was not met with this type of open criticism.
His recent move on the other hand, has brought up the depth of the divisions
within Iraqiya. As April 2013’s provincial elections near, the competition
between the parts of the Iraqi National Movement are increasing, because the
major factions are running separately. Their stance towards the protest
movement has become a central issue. Mutlaq tried to frame his return to the
cabinet as a triumph for the demonstrators as he claimed that it agreed to all
of their major demands. The rest of Iraqiya saw Mutlaq as a turncoat who broke
their boycott in favor of a compromise with Maliki. Their differences being
aired to the press is part of this campaign to differentiate each other before
the vote. It also shows that the INM are no longer working together as whole.
The problems within Iraqiya were already apparent over the
boycott. Electricity Minister Abdul Karim Aftan returned to the cabinet in
February, saying that he was a technocrat who had to do his job. Minister
of State for Provincial Affairs Turhan Mathhar Abdullah Hassan also broke the boycott, while a few lawmakers from the list criticized the decision to
pull out the ministers as well. Talal al-Zoba’I and Talal Hussein for example,
both said that the boycott was made by the list’s leadership who never consulted with the rank and file. There were also arguments over whether the Iraqiya ministers should resign to support the demonstrators, after
Agriculture Minister Izz al-Din al-Dawla stepped down to condemned the shooting of protesters in Mosul. The same thing happened during the last boycott
that was started in December 2011. That time the National Movement pulled
out of both the cabinet and parliament. Speaker Nujafi, Electricity Minister
Aftan, and Industry Minister Karbuli never complied, and the boycott only lasted until the end of January, because the list was going to break up
over it. The boycott achieved nothing as the government continued its work,
because the National Movement didn’t have the numbers in either the cabinet or
parliament to stop anything. The same thing is true for the current boycott,
except this time it appears Iraqiya has finally broken up.
While the Iraqi National Movement still exists, it is in
name only. There are several different factions, which are going to compete
against each other in the April elections. Jamal Karbuli of the Solution List,
Saad al-Janabi of the Iraqi Republican Grouping, and Deputy Premier Mutlaq of
the Iraqi National Dialogue Front are running together as the Arabic Iraqiya. Speaker Nujafi of the National Assembly and former Finance Minister Issawi
of the National Future Gathering have formed another list, while Iyad
Allawi has registered under Iraqiya. There are a large number of National
Movement members who have not decided who will they will join. Still, in
Shiite provinces, many of these parties are going to run together to try to pull votes. The break-up of Iraqiya was a long time coming. From the
beginning it was made up of too many parties with too many divergent views.
From the moment it entered into negotiations to form a new government after the
2010 elections its differences became apparent. During the 2011 boycott, several
parliamentarians quit or were expelled, because they disagreed with pulling out
of the government. Now the major leaders have all split marking the final end of
the list.
Politicians will continue to talk about the Iraqi National
Movement, but for all intents and purposes it is over. Mutlaq, and the two
minister’s choice to cut a deal with Maliki to break the on-going boycott
brought out all of the differences within the list into the public eye. Iraqiya
has now broken up into different factions, which will compete against each
other in many of the provinces in the April elections. The ultimate winner is
Prime Minister Maliki. The INM was his main opponent. His strategy was to
always wait them out, because he knew that they were riven with rivalries, and
did not have the numbers to pose a real threat to his rule. That has now come
to fruition, and the premier is in a stronger position. The different parts of
Iraqiya are likely to work and fight with each other over the coming years, but
are unlikely to come together in such a large gathering as they did for the
2010 elections.
SOURCES
Abbas, Mushreq, “Maliki Takes Steps to Ease Political,
Social Divisions in Iraq,” Al-Monitor, 3/27/13
AIN, “Breaking News….Deputy PM Mutleg resigns,” 1/28/13
- “IS MP describes his Slate as “inharmonious mixture,”
2/28/13
AK News, “Iraqiya to discuss political crisis today,”
5/14/12
Al-Ali, Daoud, “means justify ends:
a sunni MP for defence minister?” Niqash, 3/28/13
Aswat al-Iraq, “Laws connected with demonstrators agreed
upon,” 3/25/13
Gutman, Roy, “As US troops exit Iraq, Maliki moves against
Sunni rivals,” McClatchy Newspapers, 12/19/11
Habib, Mustafa, “election coalitions indicate depth of
Iraq’s sectarian divide,” Niqash, 3/14/13
Mardini, Ramzy, “Iraq’s First Post-Withdrawal Crisis,”
Institute for the Study of War, 12/19/11
National Iraqi News Agency, “Abdul Karim al-Samarrai heads a
political entity to participate in provincial elections,” 11/15/12
- “Abu Risha call on Iraqiya ministers to resign,” 3/3/13
- “Ahmed al-Alwani: Salah al-Mutlaq
reneged of Iraqiya Slate and playing a suspicious role,” 3/29/13
- “BREAKING NEWS. A new political coalition headed by Nujaifi,”
11/29/12
- “Iraqiya calls on Mutlaq to review
his position and not be a false witness,” 3/27/13
- “Iraqiya coalition suspends its attending in the
Parliament,” 12/23/12
- “Iraqiya MP: al-Nujaifi and Issawi are to form a new
bloc,” 11/12/12
- “Iraqiya MP: Political forces and figures negotiate to
form a new alliance,” 11/14/12
- “Iraqiya’s Ministers joint their resignations with
Nujaifi’s resignation,” 3/10/13
- “Majeed: Maliki asked Parliament to withdraw confidence
from Saleh al-Mutlaq,” 12/17/11
- “A new coalition, headed by al-Mutlaq, formed,” 12/3/12
- “Nijaifi calls on Iraqiya ministers to resign,” 3/8/13
- “Sajri withdraws from the alliance of Mutlaq, Karbouli,”
12/28/12
Sadah, Ali Abel, “Iraqiya List
Frays As Constituents Splinter,” Al-Monitor, 3/28/13
Shafaq News, “Council of ministers delay its sessions after
al-Iraqiya ministers boycott it,” 12/25/12
- “Council of Ministers holds its session in absence of
Kurds and al- Iraqiya,” 3/12/13
- “Al-Iraqiya attacks Aftan for his return to the Council of
Ministers meetings,” 2/27/13
Visser, Reidar, “Endgame for the Prime Minister?” Sada,
5/29/12
- “IHEC Publishes the List of Entities for the April 2013
Local Elections in Iraq,” Iraq and Gulf Analysis, 11/29/12
Wicken, Stephen, “2013 Iraq Update #9: Issawi resignation
presents opportunities to Maliki,” Institute for the Study of War, 3/1/13
Yacoub, Sameer, “Iraqi minister resigns after protesters
shot,” Associated Press, 3/8/13
2 comments:
This strikes me as several kinds of Not Good. Yeah, it was way too broad a coalition to hold together, but at least they were a bloc in Iraqi politics that *wasn't* explicitly ethno-sectarian in its goals.
Yes it did start out as a nationalist rather than sectarian party, but then quickly fell into identity politics.
Post a Comment