Most of the agencies that track deaths in Iraq saw an
increase from April to May 2014. The differences arise from the sources that
each organization uses. For those groups that did record an uptick, May turned
out to be the deadliest month of the year.
Four out of five groups had fatalities going up in Iraq in
May. Iraq Body Count went
from 1,013 deaths in April to 1,027 in May. The United
Nations along with the Anbar Health Directorate had 885 in April and 994 in
May. Agence
France Presse had the largest jump from 796 to 1,075, while Musings On Iraq
counted 1,456 fatalities in April up to 1,468 in May. The only group that
dissented was the Iraqi government that reported 1,009 deaths in April down to
938 in May. For Iraq Body Count, the U.N., and Agence France Presse last month
was the costliest of the year in terms of lives lost.
The bigger difference between the groups was not the recent
monthly totals, but the trends throughout the year. Iraq Body Count for example
has had deaths at the same level throughout the year at 33.4 per day. The Iraqi
ministries have been around the same range as well with a dip in February to
28.2, but the other four months were at around 32 deaths per day. The United
Nations’ numbers are harder to compare because for the first two months of 2014
they did not include Anbar due to the violence there. From March to May they mentioned
figures from the Anbar Health Directorate instead of ones they independently collected.
Together those two have seen a steady increase from 24.1 in March to 32.0 in
May. Agence France Presse has seen the most variation throughout 2014. Deaths
went down from January’s 26.6 to a nadir in March at 16.5 per day when the
group recorded only 512 fatalities the lowest of any organization the entire
year, and then they increased from April to May from 26.5 to 34.6. Musings On
Iraq has also seen variations going from 47.8 in January to 45.5 in February
then reaching a high of 51.8 in March before seeing a decline for the next two
months. The reason for the variations in totals and averages is that each
organization relies upon different sources. Iraq Body Count uses media reports
from international news agencies and Iraqi papers that are in English. The
Iraqi government figures are based upon the Interior, Defense, and Health
Ministries. The two security agencies always have lower figures than the Iraqi
press however. At the same time Baghdad has been releasing much more realistic
numbers over the past several months after consistently having some of the
lowest deaths counts in previous years. The U.N. uses its own field offices,
the press, and the Iraqi government. Agence France Presse relies upon its reporters
and government and medical sources as confirmation. Musings On Iraq uses
English language sources such as the press agencies and both the English and
Arabic versions of the Iraqi press. None of these collections are comprehensive
as there are plenty of attacks and casualties that are missed by the government
or press. At the same time they all agree that violence is going up in the
country.
Deaths
In Iraq 2003-2013
Month/Year
|
Iraq Body Count
|
Avg. Daily Deaths
|
Iraqi Ministries
|
Avg. Daily Deaths
|
United Nations
|
Avg. Daily Deaths
|
Agence France Presse
|
Avg. Daily Deaths
|
Musings On Iraq
|
Avg. Daily Deaths
|
2003
|
4,675
|
19.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2004
|
11,608
|
31.8l
|
11,313
|
30.99
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2005
|
16,186
|
44.2
|
15,817
|
43.3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2006
|
29,144
|
79.8
|
32,622
|
89.3
|
34,452
|
94.3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2007
|
25,519
|
69.9
|
19,155
|
52.4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2008
|
9,839
|
26.9
|
9,046
|
24.7
|
11,536
|
31.6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2009
|
5,132
|
14.0
|
3,682
|
10.0
|
4,611
|
12.6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2010
|
4,109
|
11.2
|
3,949
|
10.8
|
4,855
|
13.3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2011
|
4,147
|
11.3
|
2,781
|
7.6
|
4,150
|
11.3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2012
|
4,573
|
12.5
|
2,174
|
5.9
|
3,878
|
10.6
|
1,531
(7 mo.)
|
7.1
|
-
|
-
|
Jan. 2013
|
357
|
11.5
|
177
|
5.7
|
319
|
10.2
|
246
|
7.9
|
-
|
-
|
Feb.
|
360
|
12.7
|
136
|
4.8
|
418
|
14.9
|
220
|
7.8
|
-
|
-
|
Mar.
|
403
|
13.0
|
163
|
5.2
|
456
|
14.7
|
271
|
8.7
|
-
|
-
|
Apr.
|
545
|
18.1
|
208
|
6.9
|
712
|
23.7
|
461
|
15.3
|
-
|
-
|
May
|
888
|
28.6
|
681
|
21.9
|
1,045
|
33.7
|
614
|
19.8
|
-
|
-
|
Jun.
|
659
|
21.9
|
240
|
8.0
|
761
|
25.3
|
452
|
15.0
|
-
|
-
|
Jul.
|
1,145
|
36.9
|
989
|
31.9
|
1,057
|
34.0
|
875
|
28.2
|
-
|
-
|
Aug.
|
1,012
|
32.6
|
365
|
11.7
|
804
|
25.9
|
693
|
22.3
|
-
|
-
|
Sep.
|
1,221
|
40.7
|
971
|
32.3
|
979
|
32.6
|
880
|
29.3
|
-
|
-
|
Oct.
|
1,095
|
35.3
|
964
|
31.0
|
979
|
31.5
|
743
|
23.9
|
-
|
-
|
Nov.
|
903
|
30.1
|
948/
1,121
|
31.6/
37.3
|
659
|
21.9
|
693
|
23.1
|
-
|
-
|
Dec.
|
983
|
31.7
|
1,001
|
32.2
|
759
|
24.4
|
668
|
21.5
|
-
|
-
|
2013
Totals
|
9,571
|
25.9
|
6,843/
7,016
|
18.7/
19.2
|
8,948
|
24.5
|
6,818
|
18.6
|
-
|
-
|
Jan. 2014
|
1,076
|
34.7
|
1,013
|
32.6
|
733*
|
23.6
|
991
|
31.9
|
1,483
|
47.8
|
Feb.
|
930
|
33.2
|
790
|
28.2
|
703*
|
25.1
|
747
|
26.6
|
1,274
|
45.5
|
Mar.
|
1,009
|
32.5
|
1,004
|
32.3
|
748
|
24.1
|
512
|
16.5
|
1,606
|
51.8
|
Apr.
|
1,013
|
33.7
|
1,009
|
33.6
|
885
|
29.5
|
796
|
26.5
|
1,456
|
48.5
|
May
|
1,027
|
33.1
|
938
|
30.2
|
994
|
32.0
|
1,075
|
34.6
|
1,468
|
47.5
|
2014
Totals
|
5,055
|
33.4
|
4,754
|
31.4
|
4,063
|
26.9
|
4,121
|
27.2
|
7,287
|
48.2
|
* Figures do not include Anbar
SOURCES
Agence France Presse, “Iraq casualties from violence (2014)”
Faraj, Salam, “Attacks kill 16 as
May toll tops 900,” Agence France Presse, 6/1/14
Iraq Body Count, “Database”
5 comments:
Hey Joel, just a couple quick comments. I think you may want to note that the IBC numbers are for civilian deaths and are therefore somewhat different than some of the other numbers. For example, I think the reason your own count is several hundred higher than IBC here is probably mostly to do with the fact that you're including soldiers, insurgents, etc., while IBC is limited to civilians. It may partly be due to different sources or interpretations but I'd bet it's mostly to do with the civilian/combant difference, but you don't mention this difference. So I'd assume that your and our totals actually aren't as far apart as the total numbers appear.
Also, IBC does include Arabic sources from the Iraqi press, such as Al-Sumaria, Al-Rayy, Al-Masalah and others.
Hi Josh
Know that IBC only includes civilians, sahwa and police. My count does not count insurgents just civilians, soldiers, police, Sahwa, peshmerga.
In May 2014 for example I have 875 civilians, 506 ISF, 77 Sahwa, 1 Peshmerga. The 506 ISF was roughly 60% soldiers, 40% police.
Didn't know IBC started including the Arabic press already.
Josh forgot to add. Although all the big attacks like bombings are included in the vast majority of reporting the Iraqi papers are not so consistent on smaller incidents. For example one paper I read is good on Anbar and Baghdad but says very little about attacks in Salahaddin and Diyala. The point being the more papers that are included the more information you're going to get about attacks and casualties.
Interesting. I wasn't clear on exactly what you did or didn't include. Still, if you drop around 300 soldiers then most of the difference in your and our numbers goes away and they wind up much closer than they appear from just the totals.
I'm curious why you chose not to include insurgents. What is the reasoning there?
On the Arabic issue, IBC has been including Arabic sources since around last fall. This started out with a few and has grown a bit, partly thanks to ones that you've cited that we didn't know about (thanks!). Prior to that we limited to stuff that was in English or which was translated from Arabic into English by professional services.
Josh
Yes I remember our conversation on the Arabic sources. I just didn't realize that you had already started including them in your count.
Don't include insurgents because trying to cover the violence they are causing and not interested in their losses.
Post a Comment