Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was most famous for leading Al Qaeda in
Iraq (AQI). In fact, his first organization was called Tawhid wal Jihad, which
he formed in the 1990s before he had joined al Qaeda. In 2002, Zarqawi
travelled to Iraq to prepare for the U.S. invasion. It wasn’t until January
2004 that he asked for assistance from Al Qaeda central, and then in October
2004 he finally pledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden. Zarqawi proved to be a
much more bloodthirsty terrorist than even bin Laden was used to as AQI became
committed to attacking Iraqis, and especially Shiites to start a civil war,
which was hoped would destabilize the country and lead to the failure of the
American effort in Iraq. To help explain Zarqawi’s career in Iraq is former CIA
analyst Nada Bakos. She was part of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center who was
sent to Iraq shortly after the 2003 invasion to track Zarqawi’s activities.
Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi turned his Tawhid wal Jihad into Al Qaeda In Iraq in 2004 (Institute for the Study of Violent Groups)
1. When did the CIA
send you to Iraq?
That was right after the invasion in May 2003.
2. When you were sent
there were you tasked with following the insurgency or just intelligence
gathering in general?
Remember in May 2003 we hadn’t experienced an increase in violence
yet. The uptick started while I was there.
I was sent to Iraq as an expert for my team [the CIA’s Iraq
Counterterrorism unit] because they needed someone who could evaluate Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi’s network, and if he had a connection to Al Qaeda. They wanted at
least one expert on the ground in case something came up, but also at that
point the CIA was just trying to find out what Zarqawi’s network was doing.
3. Zarqawi had his
own group Tawhid wal Jihad that he started in the 1990s. After he came to Iraq
in January 2004 he asked Al Qaeda for aid, and then in October 2004 pledged
allegiance to Osama bin Laden. Why did he decide to make that connection to Al
Qaeda?
At the time everyone thought of course Zarqawi was going to
join Al Qaeda, because it’s Al Qaeda, it’s a bigger brand. Yet he had all the
money. He was galvanizing all this support and new recruits because he was gaining
ground, not unlike what the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) is
doing now. Al Qaeda at the time was still the big dog on the block. They were
worth joining from his perspective because they would have more consistent
funding, weapons, people, and give him a broader reach. Yet, he managed to do
it on his terms.
4. In the HBO
documentary “Manhunt, The Search for Bin Laden” you said that Zarqawi was different from others
leaders in Al Qaeda. What was the big difference that led AQ to criticize him
in 2005-2006 in two letters saying that he was hurting their cause?
The tactics that ISIS are using today stem from Zarqawi’s
strategy. He took advantage of the sectarian divide, using it purposely to
cause more destruction. He knew that was going to cause a huge disruption for
U.S. troops, which it did.
The differences that emerged with Al Qaeda was how Zarqawi
was waging jihad. Al Qaeda was disgruntled with how he was going about killing
Muslims and civilians seemingly at random. They wanted to reign him in, but he
wasn’t having it. He had figured out his strategy early on, and this was how he
was going to approach jihad, and he was actually going to take advantage of the
insurgency. That’s what ISIS is doing now.
5. It seems like ISIS
is trying to do the same things Zarqawi did. ISIS cooperates with different
insurgent groups, and it sees itself as the vanguard leading all these other organizations.
What kind of cooperation did Zarqawi have with other militant groups?
Zarqawi ran a very different organization than core Al
Qaeda. He wasn’t as stringent about the hierarchy in his organization. He
started out with what we termed as a network. His nodules of contact were more
like concentric circles whereas Al Qaeda has a hierarchy. He wasn’t as
concerned with that. He ended up working with random insurgent groups just from
an opportunist perspective versus worrying about whether they were pledging
allegiance to him or really why they were fighting. His concern wasn’t the same
as what Al Qaeda does when they join allegiance with someone. He was taking
advantage of the insurgency just depending upon the territory. That was a big
distinction. That was a strength and a drawback. When you look at ISIS today it
appears that they are more military like in the way that they approach what
they’re doing. They seem to have more of a structure, more of a hierarchy. In
large part probably because these are Iraqis that were probably in the military
or the Baathist regime at one point, so that’s their background and experience.
6. Did Zarqawi get
into arguments with other insurgent groups as well?
Yes, I think I vaguely remember some. It wasn’t on the scale
of Jabhat al-Nusra and ISIS. Not even remotely close. There were certainly
plenty of arguments. Look at the arguments between him and core Al Qaeda,
Zarqawi wasn’t someone who was going to give up his stance. How much
inter-jihadi violence there was I’m not really sure.
7. How about Zarqawi’s
funding. Today a lot of Iraqis talk about how ISIS is funded from donations
from the Gulf States and Saudi Arabia. Where did Zarqawi’s money mostly come
from?
ISIS has a lot of its own funding. I don’t think even the
U.S. government thinks most of their funding is coming from the Gulf States. Zarqawi
began his start up in the 1990s, it was a $200,000 loan from bin Laden. He
continued to galvanize more support as time went on because he was focusing on
the Jordanian government. He was getting support from people that supported
that cause. He was really looking at the Levant at that time. Then of course
once Iraq popped up that was an opportunity for him. He ended up getting a lot
of money from different sources and donors because he was the main player. Al
Qaeda wasn’t doing anything on the same scale as Zarqawi after 9/11. So he
ended up attracting a lot more funding at that time.
8. Was he getting
most of that money from within Iraq or from foreign sources?
The majority of his network was foreign fighters. He pulled
from all sorts of areas. He pulled guys from the Maghreb, from the Levant. He
had some fighters from the Caucuses. He had a global network not unlike Al
Qaeda, so they were tapping into a lot of the same sources.
9. Zarqawi had a plan
called the Baghdad Belts. It seems like ISIS is trying to follow the same thing
today, get into Babil province, Anbar, etc. surround Baghdad and head for the
capital. Did you get any information about Zarqawi’s strategy?
We didn’t have the same open source visibility that you have
today about ISIS. It was not like that with Zarqawi. It was much more
clandestine and compartmented. The basic information that ISIS shares all over
social media was treated as classified by Zarqawi’s organization. Zarqawi
released videos that revealed some of his political messages, and military
capabilities, but not on the same scale as ISIS. Obviously we had clandestine
sources as well. Zarqawi’s battle plan
looks very similar to what ISIS is doing today.
10. Could you tell
the story of how the U.S. finally tracked down Zarqawi?
This is the ironic part of my experience, I spent five years
focusing on Zarqawi and two months before he was killed I decided to move onto
another assignment. I was just ready to go. Everyone I had known who had worked
on this topic had largely moved onto something else, so I decided to do the
same at that time too. In the end it doesn’t matter, it was a team effort from
the beginning and I was relieved after hearing the news.
SOURCES
Benjamin, Daniel and Simon, Steven, The Next Attack, New York: Times Books, 2005
Debat, Alexis, “Vivisecting the Jihad,” National Interest,
6/23/04
Filkins, Dexter, “Intercepted memo seeks al Qaeda aid,” San
Francisco Chronicle, 2/9/04
Gambill, Gary, “Abu Musaib Al-Zarqawi: A Biographical
Sketch,” Terrorism Monitor, Jamestown Foundation, 12/16/04
HBO, “Manhunt, The Search For Bin Laden” May 2013
Al Jazeera, “Iraqi group ‘splits’ from al-Qaeda,” 4/12/07
Reid, Robert, “U.S. planes, tanks batter insurgent
stronghold,” San Francisco Chronicle, 10/18/04
Roggio, Bill, “Dear Zarqawi: A Letter from Zawahiri, and a
Constitutional Compromise,” Long War Journal, 10/12/05
- “Harmony: The Attyia – Zarqawi Letter,” Long War Journal,
9/27/06
- “Islamic Army of Iraq splits from Al Qaeda,” Long War
Journal, 4/12/07
Ware, Michael, “The Enemy With Many Faces,” Time, 9/27/04
3 comments:
Did Ms. Bakos say why we decided to blow Mr. Zaqawi up instead of catching him as it seemed it was possible to do? Do you know why or have any idea? That has always puzzled me.
Don't know and like the interview said she left Iraq right before Zarqawi was finally tracked down and killed.
Seems to me I recall it was suspected he would be wearing a suicide device and hence too risky. I do enjoy the method used to remove him.
Post a Comment