Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz was a big fan of Laurie Mylroie and her theories about Iraq. In April 2001, during the first discussion of terrorism by the new Bush administration, Wolfowitz brought up Mylroie’s claim that Iraq was behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and therefore Baghdad not Al Qaeda should be the focus of any counter terrorism strategy. In June, the deputy secretary tried to get the CIA to look into Mylroie’s theory. On September 17, 2001 Wolfowitz sent a memo to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld advocating for the United States to attack Iraq in retaliation for 9/11. He said there was a better than 10% chance that Baghdad was behind the strikes on New York and Washington D.C. He included the 1993 bombing. Later, he sent former CIA Director James Woolsey to England to find evidence to support Mylroie’s story. Finally in November 2001 Wolfowitz wrote Rumsfeld again saying that Iraq was probably involved in 9/11 based upon Mylroie’s ideas of links between Saddam and Al Qaeda from 1993. Mylroie’s theories about Iraq and terrorism were popular amongst neoconservatives like Wolfowitz, but were totally convoluted and later proven false by captured Iraqi documents.
In the wake of the
Gulf War Laurie Mylroie went from a proponent of Iraq to one of its harshest
critiques. During the 1980s Mylroie not only pushed the U.S. to back
Saddam in the Iran-Iraq War, but tried to negotiate a deal between Baghdad and
Israel. That all changed when Saddam invaded Kuwait in 1990. She not only
called Iraq a threat to U.S. interests but came up with a complicated theory
that the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was done by Baghdad. One of the
bombers was an Iraqi named Abdul Rahman Yasin. After the attack he fled back to
his home country where he was put under house arrest. Mylroie claimed this was
a cover story and that he was actually an Iraqi agent. Another one of the
bombers, Mohammed Salameh was the nephew of Palestinian terrorist Abu Bakr who
lived in Iraq. Salameh called Bakr in 1992 and Mylroie claimed that was to get
instructions from Baghdad. She would go on to claim that a third bomber Ramzi
Yousef was actually an alias for an Iraqi intelligence agent who had assumed
his identity. She later got a job at the American Enterprise Institute which
published a book on her ideas in 2000. It was during this period that Wolfowitz
read her work and became a fan. During the Clinton administration the FBI and
CIA looked into Mylroie’s theory and found nothing to support it. That didn’t
diminish her standing with neoconservatives.
After 2003 captured Iraqi documents unraveled Mylroie’s entire story. In 1994 Saddam and his advisers
discussed the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Saddam thought U.S. intelligence
was behind the attack, while some of his advisers blamed Israel or groups in
Saudi Arabia or Egypt. Saddam was open to all these ideas because he didn’t
believe Abdul Rahman Yasin could have been involved. Yasin had fled to Iraq,
been arrested and interrogated, but Saddam didn’t believe what he said and
ordered more questioning. He in turn believed that Iraq could use Yasin as a
bargaining chip with the United States. These papers showed that Mylroie’s
entire conspiracy was nothing but nonsense. Iraq was not behind the Trade
Center attack. Yasin was not an Iraqi agent. U.S. intelligence was right when
they looked into the matter and found it lacking. What this really reveals is
the thinking of neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz. They became so obsessed
with Iraq after the Gulf War that they were willing to believe outrageous
stories like Mylroie’s. It supported their own ideas about how evil they
thought Saddam Hussein was.
SOURCES
9/11 Commission,
“9/11 Commission Report,” 7/22/04
Ackerman, Spencer,
“The Weakest Link,” Washington Monthly, November 2003
Battle, Joyce, “The
Iraq War – PART I: The U.S. Prepares for Conflict, 2001, Timeline,” National
Security Archive, 9/22/10
Benjamin, Daniel and
Simon, Steven, The Next Attack, New
York: Times Books, 2005
Bergen, Peter,
“Armchair Provocateur,” Washington Monthly, December 2003
Clarke, Richard, Against All
Enemies, Inside America’s War on Terror, Free Press: New York, London,
Toronto, Sydney, 2004
Coughlin, Con,
“Powell will struggle to link Saddam with al-Qa’eda terrorism,” Telegraph,
2/2/03
Diamond, John,
“U.S.: Iraq sheltered suspect in ’93 WTC attack,” USA Today, 9/17/03
Elliott, Michael and
Carney, James, “First Stop, Iraq,” Time, 3/31/03
Isikoff, Michael and
Corn, David, Hubris, The Inside Story Of
Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War, New York: Crown Publishers,
2006
Meyer, Ambassador
Christopher, “CONFIDENTIAL AND PERSONAL,” British Embassy, Washington, 3/18/02
Miller, Greg,
“Cheney claims al Qaeda link to Hussein,” San Francisco Chronicle, 1/23/04
Miller, Judith, “Ex-counterterrorism
chief says Bush politicized response to 9/11,” San Francisco Chronicle, 3/22/04
NBC, “The Vice
President Appears on NBC’s Meet The Press,” 12/9/01
Norton-Taylor,
Richard, “UK spies reject al-Qaida link,” Guardian, 10/10/02
PBS Frontline,
“Laurie Mylroie,” Gunning For Saddam, 11/8/01
- “R. James
Woolsey,” Gunning For Saddam, 11/8/01
- “Richard Perle,”
Gunning For Saddam, 11/8/01
Pincus, Walter and
Priest, Dana, “Some Iraq Analysts Felt Pressure From Cheney Visits,” Washington
Post, 6/5/03
Policy
Counterterrorism Evaluation Group, “Assessing the Relationship Between Iraq and
al Qaida,” Defense Department, 9/16/02
Robbins, James, “No
Question About It,” National Review, 9/19/03
Rose, David, “Saddam
and al Qaeda the link we’ve all missed,” Evening Standard, 12/9/02
Select Committee On
Intelligence United States Senate, “Report On The U.S. Intelligence Community’s
Prewar Intelligence Assessments On Iraq,” 7/7/04
Strobel, Warren,
“Former CIA Director looks for evidence that Iraq had a role in attacks,”
Knight Ridder, 10/11/01
Strobel, Warren,
Landa, Jonathan and Walcott, John, “Doubts cast on efforts to link Saddam,
al-Qaida,” Knight Ridder, 3/2/04
Tanenhaus, Sam,
“Bush’s Brain Trust,” Vanity Fair, July 2003
Vest, Jason, “Saddam
in the Crosshairs,” Village Voice, 11/20/01
Washington Post,
“Transcript: Wednesday’s 9/11 Commission Hearing,” 3/24/04
Woods, Kevin and
Lacey, James, “Iraqi Perspectives Project, Saddam and Terrorism Emerging
Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents, Volume 1 (Redacted),” Institute for
Defense Analyses, November 2007
No comments:
Post a Comment