Cockburn, Andrew and Cockburn, Patrick, Out
Of The Ashes, The Resurrection of Saddam Hussein, New York:
Harper Perennial, 2000
Out Of The Ashes, The Resurrection of Saddam Hussein
was written by the Cockburn brothers Andrew and Patrick. It covered Iraq in the
1990s starting with Iraqi invasion of Kuwait to the Bush administration’s plots
against Saddam to the United Nations sanctions and inspectors. The book goes
back and forth between the hopes of the Bush and Clinton White Houses to
overthrow and contain Saddam to his attempts to hold onto power, which proved
quite successful. The Cockburns relied upon both press reports along with
extensive interviews with Iraqis both inside and outside of the country to tell
this story. As the title suggests, the authors believed that Saddam went from
the depths of defeat to be comfortably in power during this decade, but at a
heavy cost to his country.
The book starts with the Cockburns arguing both Saddam and
Bush made mistakes during the Kuwait invasion-Gulf War. On Saddam’s part by
1990 when he invaded Kuwait there was no one left in the regime that would
stand up to him. Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz made one little comment to him
about how he thought it was a bad idea, but no one else said a word. Saddam
completely misread how the world would react, and got no advice from his inner
circle. Bush called for the Iraqis to overthrow the regime hoping that would
lead to a coup. Instead it helped start the 1991 Intifada which the White House
was unwilling to support because it was afraid Iran was involved and that Iraq
might break apart. The uprising also ironically ended any hope of a coup as the
military rallied around Saddam. Afterward there were many in America who
believed the president made an additional error by not marching on Baghdad. The
authors made a very astute observation that the Gulf War was a conservative one
to return to the status quo ante not bring about real change to the Middle
East. In the end, neither Saddam nor Bush were satisfied with how the war
ended, and the Cockburns have good reasons why. Both believed their objectives
were obtainable but misread the situation. Finally, the authors point out how
outside observers also had high hopes, but the war was about returning
stability not transformation. Even Bush wanted Saddam replaced by a general or
another Baathist that would maintain the government. He didn’t want to shake
things up which was why he never considered supporting the revolt.
Another two major issues covered in the book were the U.N.
sanctions and weapons inspections. The restrictions on Iraq’s trade were
originally imposed for its invasion of Kuwait. After the Gulf War however the
Bush administration maintained them in part to contain Iraq and because it
still held hopes that they could lead to a coup. All along the Americans knew
that the victims would be the Iraqi public. As Deputy National Security Adviser
Robert Gates said in May 1991 Iraqis “would pay the price” as long as Saddam
stayed in power. The U.S. and U.K. were on the United Nations committee that
went over all the goods that were allowed into Iraq and vetoed anything with
dual use capabilities such as chlorine that was used to clean water but could
also be used for WMD. The result was the middle class was destroyed and services
collapsed. Raw sewage for instance was being pumped into Iraq’s rivers because
the water treatment plants were not repaired due to a lack of spare parts. The
humanitarian crisis eventually led to the Oil for Food program where Iraq was
able to sell some of its petroleum again under U.N. auspices. Baghdad
completely manipulated the system and the elite were able to make huge profits,
while much of the public still suffered. The other part of this policy was the
inspectors. Saddam originally thought they would only last a few months. In July
1991 Iraq decided to confess to the bare minimum about its weapons programs,
destroyed much of its WMD stocks secretly, while hiding as much as it could.
This would come to haunt Iraq for several reasons. First, it could never prove
that it got rid of its stocks of chemical and biological weapons because it
didn’t document it. Second, Baghdad’s concealment program led the inspectors,
Washington and London to never trust the Iraqis no matter what they said. Thus
the inspections became open ended because it was always felt that Saddam was
hiding something. Finally, it led to brinkmanship between Saddam and Clinton in
the late 1990s. Saddam knew that the sanctions would never be lifted so he had
no reason to work with them and therefore played games with them like stopping
and starting cooperation. For Clinton he increasingly wanted to punish Saddam
for these actions, which would eventually lead to a series of bombings. The
whole process ended by 1998 when Saddam expelled the U.N. team. The Cockburns
lay out all the back and forth between the two sides during this period. By the
end of the decade, Iraq and America were simply seeing who had the stronger
will and the inspections had become secondary. This was another reason why the
sanctions were never lifted and the Iraqi people had to pay the price. That was
the Cockburns ending thought that the innocent civilians of the country were
caught in the middle of this power struggle, and neither Saddam, Bush or
Clinton cared. This was one another of the strengths of the book that it was
able to get to the core of this conflict and its consequences.
Out Of The Ashes provides interesting insights into
Iraq in the 1990s. It is a very easy and short read, but packed full of
information. It’s obvious that the Cockburns were very well connected. They
talked with government officials to common Iraqis to exiles to the opposition.
During the decade Saddam went from military defeat in the Gulf War to almost
losing power during the 1991 uprising. The U.S. believed it held the upper
hand, but Saddam proved resilient. He was able to manipulate the inspections
and the sanctions to his benefit and remained in power all the way until 2003. His
country however fell apart and the developing society he helped create in the
1970s was destroyed in the process. That’s the authors final point, and a
fitting end to the story they told.
No comments:
Post a Comment