Krohley,
Nicholas, The Death of the Mehdi Army, The
Rise, Fall, and Revival of Iraq’s Most Powerful Militia, London: Hurst & Company, 2015
Nicholas
Krohley was a member of a U.S. Army Human Terrain Team working in east Baghdad
during the Surge. This was part of the military’s attempt to understand the
socio-cultural dynamics of the areas it was operating in Iraq. He was in the
capital when the U.S. and Iraqi forces challenged Moqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi
Army in its home turf of Sadr City and the surrounding area. The Death of
the Mehdi Army attempts to tie in the history of east Baghdad and the rise
of the Sadr movement to explain how its militia collapsed in 2008.
Krohley
begins with the migration of poor Iraqis from the south to the capital and the hap
hazard government planning that created east Baghdad. The settling of tribes by
the Ottoman Empire that turned the tribes people into serfs that were exploited
by their sheikhs started the process of movement to the capital. Most of them
moved into east Baghdad which was open land at the time. Later agricultural
reforms carried out by General Qasim and the Baath drove more people out of the
south, while the authorities never provided enough housing or services for all
the new arrivals to Baghdad. Those trends would continue right up to the 2003
invasion. The book explains how Baghdad became a metropolis in a short period
of time in part thanks to this massive movement of people. While there were
middle and working class families, Sunnis, Christians and Baath Party housing
complexes the vast majority in the eastern section were poor Shiites from the
south that were continuously replenished by new arrivals. These people were
looked down upon as rabble and neglected by both the government, the Shiite
clergy, and the middle and working classes. Despite their squalid conditions
Krohley notes that many of these migrants still felt they were better off in
the city than living in the rural south.
The book
next deals with the rise of the Sadr Trend that directly appealed to the poor,
but then fumbled its success. Ayatollah Mohammed Sadiq al-Sadr was originally
supported by Saddam Hussein because he criticized the Najaf establishment and
Iran, and championed tribalism. Sadr later began criticizing the government
which led to his assassination. His son Moqtada built upon his father’s legacy
and created the only mass movement in post-Saddam Iraq. By 2006 he had leading
positions in the government and his militia the Mahdi Army was sweeping across
the capital during the sectarian war. Krohley argues that Sadr struggled with
success however. The violence perpetrated by the Mahdi Army alienated many,
there was no strategy on how to run the conquered areas, many elements of the
militia preyed upon the people it was supposed to protect, and when the civil
war was largely over Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki no longer needed him. The
book believes these were the underlying factors that led to the Mahdi Army’s
collapse in 2008. It’s image of victory on the battlefield of Baghdad belied
its underlying weaknesses. It had not really organized the sections of east
Baghdad it seized. There were many people who retreated into their homes
because they were afraid of all the violence going on. There were still vestiges
of the middle class that looked down upon the poor and the Sadrists. Likewise
there were residents who turned against the Trend because elements extorted
them for money, threatened them, etc. The Sadr movement also lacked the
capacity to set up effective government and resources in the east. It was for
these reasons that the U.S. and Iraqi forces were able to break up the Mahdi
Army in rapid fashion in 2008 instead of having to take part in an extended
battle as many expected.
The
Death of the Mehdi Army
is part history and sociological study of east Baghdad and the Sadrists and
part military study of the campaign against the Mahdi Army in 2007-08.
Thankfully it has plenty of maps to distinguish one area from another in the
capital. That’s important because each section is broken down into smaller
units and without the maps there’d be no telling one from another. It does a
great job connecting all the dots between how east Baghdad grew, to the neglect
it suffered, to how Ayatollah Sadr and his son built upon those conditions, and
then how the Mahdi Army failed to exploit its military successes. There were
some core areas of east Baghdad that were bastions of the movement, but many
others were only marginally supportive. When the Iraqis and Americans moved
into the east it found that the Sadrists did not have a popular base as
expected. At the same time, after the military campaign was over the east
remained poor and destitute as the authorities didn’t have the resources to
provide services or governance. Krohley finished by writing that the Surge had
a hollow victory in this part of the capital as the Iraqi government and
Americans did little better than Sadr in running the east, and Moqtada survived
and found continued roles in the government and politics.
Link to all of Musings On Iraq’s
book reviews
listed by topic
No comments:
Post a Comment