Several western
countries and companies assisted Iraq when it set out to build its chemical
weapons programs in the 1970s. A decade later when Baghdad would use those
systems in the Iran-Iraq War, those same nations were largely quiet giving
their implicit support to Iraq. The press however was quite active in
uncovering where Iraq’s WMD came from.
Two years into the
Iran-Iraq War the Iraqi government began turning to chemical weapons. After quick victories in the opening months of the conflict,
Saddam Hussein made the strategic mistake of halting offensive operations and
attempting to negotiate a ceasefire. When that failed the two sides settled
into a grinding war of attrition with Tehran holding a huge population
advantage. One of Iraq’s responses was to use chemical weapons.
Iraq’s use of
chemical weapons increased in both its application and tactical planning as the
war progressed. In 1982 Iraq used tear gas on Iranian troops, followed by the
deployment of chemical agents the following year. Their first major use was in
the Val Fajr II campaign in the summer of 1983 when mustard gas was deployed.
In early 1984 the Iraqi military was using tabun in the Khaybar I campaign in
Basra. By the end of the war Iraq was using its chemical stockpiles more and
more to deadlier effect. There was no effort to stop Baghdad because it had the
support of so many powerful countries.
From the start Iran
complained about Iraq’s use of these deadly materials, but the major powers
remained silent. Starting in 1983 Tehran tried to publicize Iraq’s chemical
weapons programs going to the press and international organizations, but they
were initially ignored. The Soviet Union was the largest provider of weapons to
Iraq before the war, and almost all the munitions filled with WMD and used in the war originated in the USSR. Moscow had
also trained Iraqi forces in the use of biological and chemical weapons starting in
the 1960s. Iran singled out Russia in 1984 as a major
military supporter of Baghdad including chemical agents, but the Communist
government said nothing in response. Later in the year when the United Nations
decided to send a team to Iran to investigate the use of WMD, the Soviets
objected. France was Saddam’s second largest military supporter and said
nothing about the use of chemical weapons. Its two largest newspapers even
suggested that Iranians had been injured in factory accidents rather than by
Iraqi chemicals. The United States was slightly different. Some members in
Congress were opposed to Saddam’s regime and brought up the WMD issue. That led
the State Department to condemn their use in 1984. The Reagan administration
however was helping Iraq early on in the war, and towards the end of the conflict provided intelligence for Iraqi operations that they knew would
include the use of mustard gas and other agents. As Javed Ali wrote in 2001 for
The Nonproliferation Review by the
end of the war everyone knew Saddam was using chemical agents, but no
government was interested in holding Iraq responsible let alone punishing it.
That was because so much of the international community was opposed to Iran and
its new government, which had just held American diplomats at the U.S. embassy
for over a year and was talking about exporting its Islamic revolution. There
was another factor for why the world turned a blind eye, the Americans and
Europe had assisted Iraq with its WMD.
The United States
press was especially good at revealing how America and Europe had helped Iraq
build its chemical program. The Washington Post (1) for example documented how
in 1975 Baghdad contacted the Pfaudler Company in New York to build a pesticide
plant in Samarra. It started the work, but never finished it when it became
suspicious about why the Iraqi Agriculture Ministry wanted it to produce four
toxic agents that were very close to nerve gas. Germany’s Karl Kolb eventually
completed the factory in the 1980s. It became known as the Muthanna State
Establishment, and was the country’s largest producer of WMD. The Wall Street
Journal (2) uncovered that a U.S. subsidiary of Belgium’s Phillips Petroleum
sold pesticide to Iraq in 1983 that was used to produce mustard gas. The paper
also found that Germany’s W.E.T. G.m.b.H. sold the Iraqi government $10 million
worth of equipment and agents that were also used for nerve gas. These were
just a few of many other instances of companies supplying Saddam’s WMD
programs. Washington and Berlin actually tried to stop many of these
transactions and put in a series of export controls, but because much of the
equipment and agents could be used in regular commercial activities there were
too many loopholes for these regulations to work.
In the 1980s Iraq
had the backing of Europe and America to use weapons of mass destruction
against Iran. Both eastern and western European countries had long standing
ties with Iraq and saw it as an important market for its weapons and influence
in the Middle East. The United States tilted towards Iraq during the Iran-Iraq
War because it wanted to contain the Iranian revolution. That was why there was
never any serious effort to stop Baghdad when it began using chemical weapons
against Tehran. Even when those countries began being exposed as the source for
much of the equipment and agents that would lead to Iraq’s WMD programs there
was no real change in policy. Ironically, just a few years later the West would
change its stance after the Gulf War and want to disarm Iraq, and there would
be another round of media on just where these unconventional weapons came from.
FOOTNOTES
1. Ignatius, David,
“Iraq’s Protracted Hunt for Chemical Weapons,” Washington Post National Weekly
Edition, 10/3-9/88
2. Fialka, John,
“Fighting Dirty Western Industry Sells Third World the Means To Produce Poison
Gas,” Wall Street Journal, 9/16/88
SOURCES
Ali, Javed,
“Chemical Weapons and the Iran-Iraq War: A Case Study in Noncompliance,” The
Nonprolfieration Review, Spring 2001
Central Intelligence
Agency, “Impact and Implications of Chemical Weapons Use I the Iran-Iraq War,”
Spring 1988
Fialka, John,
“Fighting Dirty Western Industry Sells Third World the Means To Produce Poison
Gas,” Wall Street Journal, 9/16/88
Guthrie, Richard, “A
Chronology of Events Relating to Iraq and Chemical & Biological Weapons
1984,” April 2007
Harris, Shane and
Aid, Matthew, “Exclusive. CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed
Iran,” Foreign Policy, 8/26/13
Hersh, Seymour,
“U.S. Secretly Gave Aid to Iraq Early in its War Against Iran,” New York Times,
1/26/92
Ignatius, David,
“Iraq’s Protracted Hunt for Chemical Weapons,” Washington Post National Weekly
Edition, 10/3-9/88
Kessler, Glenn,
“History lesson: When the United States looked the other way on chemical
weapons,” Washington Post, 9/4/13
New York Times,
“U.N. Panel Says Iraq Used Gas on Civilians,” 8/24/87
Oygarden, Randi
Hunshamar, “Chemical Weapons and the Iran-Iraq War, A discussion of the UN
Security Council’s response to the use of gas in the Iran-Iraq war 1980-1988,”
MA Thesis in History, University of Bergensis, Autumn 2014
Rajaee, Farhang editor,
The Iran-Iraq War: The Politics of
Aggression, Gainseville: University Press of Florida, 1993
No comments:
Post a Comment