Rubble in Mosul (AFP/Getty Images) |
The war against the Islamic State ended two years ago and some areas were liberated five years ago, yet the Iraqi government has not come up with a reconstruction plan. This is delaying foreign assistance as many countries and groups are waiting for Baghdad to take the lead, but it has not stepped forward.
The European Union ambassador to Iraq told
the Christian Science Monitor that Iraq had no rebuilding policy. He said
that Western countries have not donated a lot as a result. He went on to say
that the EU had plans for Mosul and other areas, but Baghdad hadn’t provided
any leadership, so they haven’t been implemented. Instead, the EU and others
have given money to the United Nations and the International Organization for
Migration, the premier group working with the displaced, instead.
This is counter to the official line coming from Baghdad.
For example, President Barham Salah asked the international community for help with
rebuilding the country in February. Foreign Minister Mohammed al-Hakim
claimed he was creating
a committee to oversee the $30 billion that was pledged at the Kuwait
conference, but the committee has done nothing. Much of the money that has been
donated is stuck in red tape. For
example, France gave a grant to rebuild the University of Mosul while the
United Arab Emirates gave money to reconstruct the al-Nuri Mosque and Hadbaa
minaret in Mosul. Neither has moved forward because of the slow pace of the
Iraqi bureaucracy.
The result of these two events, the lack of a plan and red
tape is that rebuilding is slow, uneven and haphazard across the country. West
Mosul for example, was completely flattened in the war. Locals, the provincial
government, the U.N. and NGOs have been left to do most of the work. The United
Nations just
announced a plan to fix 15,000 homes in the district in March. In other
areas such as the southern
Sinjar district in Ninewa there is massive property damage, no services,
and unexploded ordinance. The area is almost completely empty of people as a
result. In contrast, in Fallujah and Ramadi, much has been repaired in part
because they were liberated early on in the war compared to Ninewa that wasn’t
freed until 2017. With no government strategy there is no prioritization of
what areas should be worked on first. There is little coordination between
restoring housing, services, and the return of displaced people. Finally, there
is not enough money, and the bureaucracy is holding up some major projects as
well. That will leave many areas of northern Iraq destroyed and neglected for
the foreseeable future limiting the return of displaced and disrupting everyday
lives for Iraqis. It will also cost the government standing with the public in
these areas and provide an opportunity for the Islamic State to recruit
disaffected citizens.
SOURCES
Peterson, Scott, “In Mosul’s enduring rubble, fertile soil for an ISIS
revival?” Christian Science Monitor, 3/14/19
Tarzi, Nazli, “A
year after Kuwait conference, Iraq is no closer to reconstruction,” Arab Weekly,
2/17/19
Xinhua, “Iraqi
president calls on int’l community to support reconstruction of Iraq,” 2/19/19
Zaya, Gevera, “Is
Mosul Headed for a Second Fall?” Fikra Forum, Washington Institute for Near
East Policy, 2/11/19
No comments:
Post a Comment